Lol, a snowflake revolt. Really?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Russian Hacking Questions
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Lol, a snowflake revolt. Really?
All fair, agree with you. At least we have a thorough investigation.
Great, so when that takes place, and if it finds proof, then you'll be found to be right. Until then, it's all speculation.
And of course they were all squeaky clean and there was nothing to be seen or to report right?
There are several articles on the past week quoting prominent Republicans they also tried to hack or phish.
So hey, let's have a full blown investigation on who exactly hacked and phished and why they either only did so against Democrats or else why they have not leaked dirty material of hacks of Republicans. All for full disclosure. All for the truth and honesty. Agree?
And if they did hack Republicans but could not bring up any dirt then they ought to prove it by revealing email content of Trump or Cruz or who have you. Then the world will see how dirty Democrats are but not Republicans. Right? And if it was a disgruntled or disgusted Democrat who leaked it then we also shall find out and peacefully move on with out lives.
But if we find out that someone manipulated the American electorate by only dishing up Democrat dirt and not Republican even when it was available then this clearly means the election was rigged and ought to be void and repeated.
And if they did hack Republicans but could not bring up any dirt then they ought to prove it by revealing email content of Trump or Cruz or who have you. Then the world will see how dirty Democrats are but not Republicans. Right? And if it was a disgruntled or disgusted Democrat who leaked it then we also shall find out and peacefully move on with out lives.
But if we find out that someone manipulated the American electorate by only dishing up Democrat dirt and not Republican even when it was available then this clearly means the election was rigged and ought to be void and repeated.
An emergency message from Christopher Green at AMTV "Hard hitting and in your face".
Sounds like Herlordly also intends to be hard hitting and in our faces, despite her eery silence (except to send out the signal she plans to shut down alternative media).
In my blue state, there's an Elector who stated, last summer, he will not lodge his vote for Herlordly. And, he said he hopes the election comes down to his vote. By the looks of it, that could very well happen.
Sounds like Herlordly also intends to be hard hitting and in our faces, despite her eery silence (except to send out the signal she plans to shut down alternative media).
In my blue state, there's an Elector who stated, last summer, he will not lodge his vote for Herlordly. And, he said he hopes the election comes down to his vote. By the looks of it, that could very well happen.
Last edited:
But if we find out that someone manipulated the American electorate by only dishing up Democrat dirt and not Republican even when it was available then this clearly means the election was rigged and ought to be void and repeated.
Basically, by your own definition of what a "hack" is, then the mainstream media has hacked the election...but failed. If they dug up dirt on Trump and protected their nominee, then they have "hacked", by your own standard.
You think that's OK because they are U.S. based operatives (the MSM)?
And of course, the alternative media, in support of Trump's surrogates, also "hacked", if that's the definition of hacking.
Personally, I call it campaigning.
But let's stick with your definition, even though you deliberately conflate with a cybersecurity term reserved for accessing computers (think voting machines). Let's go with hacking, to distract simple minded idiots that you really mean campaigning.
With all the "hacking" going on just with U.S. based operations, patriots vs lefty globalists, you think Russian influence constitutes justification to void an election?
First of all, what makes you think that lefty GLOBALISTS and their GLOBAL backers are less FOREIGN to America then a NATIONALIST candidate and his NATIONALIST backers?
Second, if that's the definition of hacking, then that forces an analogy of a logging competition where two teams go at opposite sides of a huge tree (think virgin redwood), hacking away with any tool they can get their hands on. Let's assume most people hacking are U.S. nationals, but behind one team you have globalists, and behind the other team you have Russian nationals who share common viewpoints as the American nationals it supports, by making the other team look bad and their team look good.
This is a worst case scenario, according to your over-reaching expectations. Given this scenario, you are a hypocrite who must lose credibility. If true, it is as fair as anything the GLOBALISTS and their outside/offshore friends ever did...before losing.
Then, to say that despite billions of dollars of hacking on the globalist side, and millions on the nationalist side, the Russians had just enough influence to drop the virgin redwood on the nationalist side of the line?
Like I've said, we can argue this but it does not matter. What matters is whether the globalists will, in the next few days, be able to bribe, blackmail, and/or bamboozle 38 faithless Electors, whose prejudice blinds their judgment as much as your prejudice blinds yours. It's their blindness and ignorance that counts, not yours.
So hey, let's have a full blown investigation on who exactly hacked and phished and why they either only did so against Democrats or else why they have not leaked dirty material of hacks of Republicans. All for full disclosure. All for the truth and honesty. Agree?
.
Oh yah, so yah, let's have an investigation. For your info, Congress wanted to put some CIA leakers under oath today and start investigating the charges. But nobody called to the Hill showed up.
Nobody is interested in going before Congress under oath to maintain this NARRATIVE. But they are very interested in "briefing", before Monday, faithless Electors looking for any high sounding excuse to flip.
Just remember, you can't lie to the government, but CIA ops can lie to you.
We will have a thorough investigation no matter what. And that is good.
Oh yah, so yah, let's have an investigation. For your info, Congress wanted to put some CIA leakers under oath today and start investigating the charges. But nobody called to the Hill showed up.
Nobody is interested in going before Congress under oath to maintain this NARRATIVE. But they are very interested in "briefing", before Monday, faithless Electors looking for any high sounding excuse to flip.
Just remember, you can't lie to the government, but CIA ops can lie to you.