Oh, brother, man oh man.
I saw Usual T's quote of Biden's comment about the pipeline and assumed that because the German Chancellor was meeting with him today that that was something he had tied up with the Chancellor. Then I went on at length to express some doubts about it.
Complete waste of time on my part and others who commented. Does not appear that Biden has tied anything up with anyone or with the Krauts. MY BAD, EVERYONE'S BAD. Try to make an assumption that Joe done good, get burned everytime.
Nord Stream 2 pipeline proves to be a sticking point in Biden and new German chancellor's show of unity
But Scholz himself refused to even name the project during the news conference, and declined to commit to ending the pipeline if an invasion moves ahead -- a stance causing problems for his foreign minister during a visit to Ukraine.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/07/politics/biden-scholz-meeting-ukraine/index.html
Oh, brother, man oh man.
I saw Usual T's quote of Biden's comment about the pipeline and assumed that because the German Chancellor was meeting with him today that that was something he had tied up with the Chancellor. Then I went on at length to express some doubts about it.
Complete waste of time on my part and others who commented. Does not appear that Biden has tied anything up with anyone or with the Krauts. MY BAD, EVERYONE'S BAD. Try to make an assumption that Joe done good, get burned everytime.
Nord Stream 2 pipeline proves to be a sticking point in Biden and new German chancellor's show of unity
But Scholz himself refused to even name the project during the news conference, and declined to commit to ending the pipeline if an invasion moves ahead -- a stance causing problems for his foreign minister during a visit to Ukraine.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/07/politics/biden-scholz-meeting-ukraine/index.html
Yeah, ze Germans continue with their doddling of “strategic ambiguity.” I saw watched Scholz’s interview with Tapper and he is straddling this line of we are totally in lock step with our allies and no comment on the specifics.
I think the most likely explanation is the Germans don’t want to commit shutting down the pipeline and then Putin makes a “small” incursion and then their hands are tied.
It is important to remember when Walmart opened a store in in Germany they had to remove the greeter at the door because the German people found someone smiling and welcoming them to the store to be weird. Morose doesn’t describe the Germans well enough.
McConnell is mistaken here, preemptive sanctions would give Putin pretext for invasion. It would help Putin with public opinion back home too. However, I tend to agree that Putin is not going base his decision to go on US sanctions:
View attachment 277687
I am going to revert back to a question I asked quite a while back which no one wanted to bite into it:
Suppose Putin does not invade, and -just to keep the question simple- suppose he just "goes home" then what price should he pay just for the threatening charade?"