The Ukrainians need to take down the Kerch Bridge and take the area approaching the land bridge to Crimea. Which will not only isolate Crimea but force more troops from the Donbass to go down and protect that area and the land bridge to it. The goal is not necessarily to take Crimea but to force the Russians to commit resources to its defense. The length of their line in the donetzk and lukansk regions is ungodly long and thin as it is already.
The only way that you will get Putin to back down on the Donbass it to beat him down enough so that he fears losing Crimea too. In other words, Crimea becomes the bargaining chip. Not the Donbass/east. The Ukrainians may not be able to accomplish that but they have nothing to lose. If there is some half arse settlement where Russia gets to keep the east. They will simply resupply, regroup and come for the rest of Ukraine later.
There is much talk about the west not being able to stay the course and that is a valid concern. Neverthess, we should not lean over backwards to make things easier for Vlad when he very clearly is up to his arse in problems. He is desperately and recklessly ordering all of his commanders to take the rest of Luhansk and Donetsk by the end of March. We have seen how it has gone in the past when he has had failures and started making ballsy demands and then lots of soldiers were killed and the senior commanders were replace and then replaced again. He is going into another one of those cycles. Let him wallow in it. Vlad is only making those demands because he knows that all the oligarchs, warlords, and hardliners are about to rip his head and his arse off if he does not deliver. That is his problem. It has already been noted that the west has its problems but he has PLENTY himself.
I don't know whether this talk about the west getting complacent helps or hurts Putin. It may give him some satisfaction off his bunker that he is wearing the west down, but it also sends a signal to the Ukrainians that they need to press on harder and faster while the support is still there and show that they can win. Vlad needs to worry about that too.
On the one year anniversary I see a lot of articles and talk about how the west failed to reduce Russia's economy. But I did not see a single article about how Russia's whole strategy was to break Europe in the winter but cutting off energy but Russia totally failed to accomplish that.
And I see all this reporting about how after a year Russia is still in the east so Ukraine has accomplished nothing. When in fact, Ukraine still stands as independent country and Russia is not in a position to take the whole country- or fight NATO.
My point is that eventually there will have to be a settlement reached but there is this continuous undercurrent in some articles and post that we do not want to make Putin mad and that he is able to do XYZ so lets just get real and give him what he wants right now. NOPE.
He has big problems and I am happy to watch have to deal with them for a while.
This bullshit about how if some guy in the next town over shells my house and property long enough and kills and rapes my family that I should be a flexible, kumbaya kind of person and settle my grievances by giving him a good slice of my property and disarming myself is just that- BULLSHIT. And yes, he has nukes. So does NATO and they should be and are on full alert. This is a war of necessity for Ukraine but it is a war of choice for Russia. You enter into a half arse peace deal with Russia, and Putin will come again when Xi moves on Taiwan and the US is spread thin. And believe me, he will want more than just Ukraine.
Let things get bad enough for Putin that the hardliners move him out or diminish his power. And then work something out with them. Or just use the chaos from the internal stife as a way of weakening or dividing their command structure. Plenty of that going on right as we speak.
The only way that you will get Putin to back down on the Donbass it to beat him down enough so that he fears losing Crimea too. In other words, Crimea becomes the bargaining chip. Not the Donbass/east. The Ukrainians may not be able to accomplish that but they have nothing to lose. If there is some half arse settlement where Russia gets to keep the east. They will simply resupply, regroup and come for the rest of Ukraine later.
There is much talk about the west not being able to stay the course and that is a valid concern. Neverthess, we should not lean over backwards to make things easier for Vlad when he very clearly is up to his arse in problems. He is desperately and recklessly ordering all of his commanders to take the rest of Luhansk and Donetsk by the end of March. We have seen how it has gone in the past when he has had failures and started making ballsy demands and then lots of soldiers were killed and the senior commanders were replace and then replaced again. He is going into another one of those cycles. Let him wallow in it. Vlad is only making those demands because he knows that all the oligarchs, warlords, and hardliners are about to rip his head and his arse off if he does not deliver. That is his problem. It has already been noted that the west has its problems but he has PLENTY himself.
I don't know whether this talk about the west getting complacent helps or hurts Putin. It may give him some satisfaction off his bunker that he is wearing the west down, but it also sends a signal to the Ukrainians that they need to press on harder and faster while the support is still there and show that they can win. Vlad needs to worry about that too.
On the one year anniversary I see a lot of articles and talk about how the west failed to reduce Russia's economy. But I did not see a single article about how Russia's whole strategy was to break Europe in the winter but cutting off energy but Russia totally failed to accomplish that.
And I see all this reporting about how after a year Russia is still in the east so Ukraine has accomplished nothing. When in fact, Ukraine still stands as independent country and Russia is not in a position to take the whole country- or fight NATO.
My point is that eventually there will have to be a settlement reached but there is this continuous undercurrent in some articles and post that we do not want to make Putin mad and that he is able to do XYZ so lets just get real and give him what he wants right now. NOPE.
He has big problems and I am happy to watch have to deal with them for a while.
This bullshit about how if some guy in the next town over shells my house and property long enough and kills and rapes my family that I should be a flexible, kumbaya kind of person and settle my grievances by giving him a good slice of my property and disarming myself is just that- BULLSHIT. And yes, he has nukes. So does NATO and they should be and are on full alert. This is a war of necessity for Ukraine but it is a war of choice for Russia. You enter into a half arse peace deal with Russia, and Putin will come again when Xi moves on Taiwan and the US is spread thin. And believe me, he will want more than just Ukraine.
Let things get bad enough for Putin that the hardliners move him out or diminish his power. And then work something out with them. Or just use the chaos from the internal stife as a way of weakening or dividing their command structure. Plenty of that going on right as we speak.
Last edited: