Quote from trendlover:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The point is for me if I force/require to pay insurance for health from the university, birth control is about the health. I am not gay like you say, but if I pay insurance in my tuition, the birth control should be in the plan. I am not going to stop being together with my boyfriend. This is life, and healthy. I am not religious.
For this girl Sandra Flack, she is going to the religious university. So I assume she have religion, but she feel her religion is wrong about the birth control. She is talking about the (religion) dictate, not government. Look what she is saying.
Flack: "We expected that our schools would live up to the Jesuit creed of âcura personalisâ â to care for the whole person â by meeting all of our medical needs."
I wasn't implying you're gay, that's the point.
I've read her entire testimony. She's asking a religious organization to violate its 223 year old value system. She can go anywhere. She can go to Planned Parenthood and get a 3 year implant for $500. This BS about $3000 is what BC will end up costing once the government starts subsidizing it.
Access to BC is readily available to all. Her ability to pay for it is a completely different issue. Don't confuse the two.
Now, get Sandra's ass down to her local mosque to make these same arguments and see what happens. I'm guessing a public stoning.