Ron Paul: Crotch Groped by TSA, Calls for Boycott of Airlines

Would you boycott the airlines?

  • Yes

    Votes: 46 66.7%
  • No

    Votes: 23 33.3%

  • Total voters
    69
Quote from BSAM:

The pat search is a very effective tool to use for the prevention of contraband.

Now, I'll say what America needs to understand, but they don't want to, because most in this country aren't taking security as seriously as they should be taking it. And, they feel it is below their dignity to be properly cleared to board an airplane.

Folks, these terrorists are for real in their desire to kill Americans. (Some of you may need to read that sentence a few more times.)

So, here's the bottom line:

Which is more inconvenient to you:

Getting your balls felt off or getting your balls blown off?


That's the question, and those who are intent on killing you hope you make the wrong choice for airport security.

A pat search is a small price to pay for security. Remember our fellow Americans who were jumping out of the World Trade towers back on September 11-2001? Again, these terrorists are for real.

Think about it.

You're an idiot. Congrats.

The Border is WIDE OPEN.

Hundreds - if not thousands - of illegal immigrants cross the border into America, every day.

And they're not just Mexicans but South American, Chinese, Turkish and Middle Eastern.

Wake up, Dummy.

There is NO border security. You're the target, dumbbo.

And bomb-sniffing dogs do a better job than a pat down or a 1 million dollar perv machine.
 
Somebody tell me, why would you boycott the airlines in the USA because they are trying to protect you?

Now, I understand that some of these TSA people are not being professional. But, this is a separate problem, which can be corrected. The main focus right now should be security. Let's make sure everyone gets where they are supposed to be going. Let's prevent another 9/11!
 
Quote from BSAM:

Achilles...Because of the potential for coersion, profiling absolutely will not fix the problem.

If a certain type is the focus, then they will shift the burden to the unsuspected. Then, bam, another plane lands on the Pentagon, White House, major metro area, etc.

Bullshit.

El Al has an incredible flight safety record and they profile copiously.

And they operate in a defacto terror state.

Blows that theory out of the water.
 
Quote from BSAM:

The pat search is a very effective tool to use for the prevention of contraband.

Now, I'll say what America needs to understand, but they don't want to, because most in this country aren't taking security as seriously as they should be taking it. And, they feel it is below their dignity to be properly cleared to board an airplane.

Folks, these terrorists are for real in their desire to kill Americans. (Some of you may need to read that sentence a few more times.)

So, here's the bottom line:

Which is more inconvenient to you:

Getting your balls felt off or getting your balls blown off?


That's the question, and those who are intent on killing you hope you make the wrong choice for airport security.

A pat search is a small price to pay for security. Remember our fellow Americans who were jumping out of the World Trade towers back on September 11-2001? Again, these terrorists are for real.

Think about it.

Please let us know how 9/11 could have been prevented by the TSA patting techniques? The terrorist were only carrying box cutters that back then were not illegal to carry in a hand bag. How can you prevent a martial arts trained terrorist commando to highjack a plane by checking their genitalia?
 
Quote from BSAM:

The main focus right now should be security. Let's make sure everyone gets where they are supposed to be going. Let's prevent another 9/11!

Doesn't that start with border security? Like controlling who enters the Country?

And I agree, we need airline security.

Bomb sniffing dogs, armed pilots, metal detectors and profiling does the job.

Not testicular fondling, proctology exams, and child porn xray machines.
 
Quote from achilles28:

You're an idiot. Congrats.

The Border is WIDE OPEN.

Hundreds - if not thousands - of illegal immigrants cross the border into America, every day.

And they're not just Mexicans but South American, Chinese, Turkish and Middle Eastern.

Wake up, Dummy.

There is NO border security. You're the target, dumbbo.

And bomb-sniffing dogs do a better job than a pat down or a 1 million dollar perv machine.

Uh, what's with the personal attacks? Anyways...

Pamela Anderson is a really great looking human being. But, why are we changing the subject all of a sudden? Isn't the topic, airport security?
 
Quote from achilles28:

[B

And I stand by my comment. You're a neocon.

Other than Ron Paul, 98% of sitting Republicans are neocons, to one degree or another.

So, tell us, who do you support? [/B]

I'm not going to get into the gold standard debate, because we're not likely to change each other's mind.

Who do I support? Well, typically the most conservative person in any given race (Dem vs Rep).

I live and vote in Missouri, but I also send money to support congressional candidates in states where the polling is close as well. I financially support the Heritage Foundation as well as several other 527's.

I'm not a huge Bush supporter, as I believe he was too liberal. I don't particularly care for Carl Rove but I believe he's a very smart and pragmatic man.

I voted for McCain, but he obviously wasn't my first choice. I donated to multiple Republican primary candidates in 08, but pulled hardest for Fred Thompson.

I do give weighting to candidates that are electable. I did provide financial support to Scott Brown, who is a liberal Republican, but can certainly help us stop the Democratic agenda.

I would prefer Ron Paul or Sara Palin to Obama, but I don't believe they are very electable. I probably would throw my support to John Thune, Marco Rubio or Newt Gingrich before most others.

You can push for Ron Paul if you like, but that will likely only clear the way for Obama to continue spending and bankrupting the US.
 
Quote from BSAM:

Uh, what's with the personal attacks? Anyways...

Pamela Anderson is a really great looking human being. But, why are we changing the subject all of a sudden? Isn't the topic, airport security?

Are you that dumb you can't connect the dots?

The purpose of all this security theater is to identify terrorists.

The easiest and most lawful place to screen potential terrorists is AT THE BORDER.

Allowing terrorists to gain entry into the United States via open borders should tell you Homeland Security doesn't give a shit about homeland security. Think about it.

Instead of securing our borders, they would rather fondle your testicles and take naked pictures of your children at the airport.

It's not about security, dummy.

It's about dog training. Getting used to the Government taking your rights and having their way with you.

If it was about security, the Government would have shut down the border on Sept 12, 2001.
 
Quote from achilles28:

Are you that dumb you can't connect the dots?

The purpose of all this security theater is to identify terrorists.

The easiest and most lawful place to screen potential terrorists is AT THE BORDER.

Allowing terrorists to gain entry into the United States via open borders should tell you Homeland Security doesn't give a shit about homeland security. Think about it.

Instead of securing our borders, they would rather fondle your testicles and take naked pictures of your children at the airport.

It's not about security, dummy.

It's about dog training. Getting used to the Government taking your rights and having their way with you.

If it was about security, the Government would have shut down the border on Sept 12, 2001.

Oh, my. Little brother, you're so excited, I guess you just can't control yourself. With all due respect, I probably have forgotten more about security than you will ever know. Oh, well, have fun little one.
 
Quote from BSAM:

Oh, my. Little brother, you're so excited, I guess you just can't control yourself. With all due respect, I probably have forgotten more about security than you will ever know. Oh, well, have fun little one.

You think that's a clever response?
 
Back
Top