1. Reuters poll is with registered voters.. not likely voters and once again slanted by 5 points to the dems.
so with 2 points to Romney for likely voters... and taking away that 5 point slant and give those 5 points to I or R... Romney would be tied or winning.
-
2. Obama is losing with independents and views as unfavorable by every productive person in america.
http://news.investors.com/article/6...covery-is-worst-in-postwar-history.htm?p=full
3.
http://news.investors.com/article/6...covery-is-worst-in-postwar-history.htm?p=full
So rather than holding Obama responsible for a recession he inherited, or praising him simply because that recession didn't continue perpetually, the fairest measure of his economic stewardship is this one:
How does the Obama recovery compare to other recoveries from similar downturns across the decades?
On that basis, the Obama recovery can only be graded as a tremendous failure â as it has produced the worst rate of economic growth of any recovery in the past 65 years.
Over that span, we've had 10 previous recessions and 10 previous recoveries. According to the federal government's own Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), average real (inflation-adjusted) GDP growth in the first three years after those recessions was 4.6%.
During the Obama recovery (which began three years ago, in July 2009), average real GDP growth has been just 2.2% â less than half the historical norm. Of the past 11 recoveries, the Obama recovery has been the worst.