Quote from Ricter:
Those polls are all slanted. jem has the real, shadow data.

Quote from Ricter:
Those polls are all slanted. jem has the real, shadow data.
Quote from AK Forty Seven:
I'm about to break jems heart.On a electoral basis even Rasmussen has Obama winning the election
Check out the overly republican biased Rasmussen polls in swing states
Rasmussen- Obama + 4
![]()
Rasmussen- Obama + 6
![]()
Rasmussen- Obama + 3
![]()
Rasmussen- Obama + 5
![]()
Rasmussen- Obama + 2
![]()
Rasmussen- Obama + 1
![]()
The thing is, you don't sound like a guy who is sure.Quote from jem:
ricter is going back to take drive by pot shots... since he can not argue with the polling logic.
the data is in the polls themselves... if you subtract out the 7- 11 points of from the dem column and put them back in the independent column... you realize Romney has about a 5 to 7 point lead in a sample which would look like the 2010 election -- which was 35D/35R/30I
Quote from jem:
Once again you selectively slant
Go to the Rasmuessen map.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/2012_electoral_college_scoreboard

Quote from mrbill:
No pot shots from me, and thank you Jem for being man enough to actually make a decent bet for charity with me.
The rest of the all noise, no backbone guys, come on, I want take advantage of the obvious, Obama's winning numbers.
Come on, not even a few bucks?
Yeah, more crickets, not one true believer except for Jem.
Quote from Lucrum:
Why would anyone, let alone a "real trader", take the other side of an "obvious" loser?