Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

Quote from jem:

I have heard a few pollsters state the the states trail the national polls.
If that is true... then Romney will win easily.

Yeah,because Romney is doing so well in national polls


 
Quote from Ricter:

Those polls are all slanted. jem has the real, shadow data.

I'm about to break jems heart.On a electoral basis even Rasmussen has Obama winning the election


Check out the overly republican biased Rasmussen polls in swing states



Rasmussen- Obama + 4

36348716.png



Rasmussen- Obama + 6

82947670.png



Rasmussen- Obama + 3

31665326.png




Rasmussen- Obama + 5

21666212.png




Rasmussen- Obama + 2

69643233.png



Rasmussen- Obama + 1

 
Quote from Ricter:

Those polls are all slanted. jem has the real, shadow data.

ricter is going back to take drive by pot shots... since he can not argue with the polling logic.

the data is in the polls themselves... if you subtract out the 7- 11 points of from the dem column and put them back in the independent column... you realize Romney has about a 5 to 7 point lead in a sample which would look like the 2010 election -- which was 35D/35R/30I
 
Once again you selectively slant

Go to the Rasmuessen map.
Look at the toss up states like Florida IA NC in Romneys favor.
Romney is leading in plenty of them and by election time they will be many more in his camp.

Romney does not even have the nomination yet.
Obama is a one termer.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/2012_electoral_college_scoreboard







Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I'm about to break jems heart.On a electoral basis even Rasmussen has Obama winning the election


Check out the overly republican biased Rasmussen polls in swing states



Rasmussen- Obama + 4

36348716.png



Rasmussen- Obama + 6

82947670.png



Rasmussen- Obama + 3

31665326.png




Rasmussen- Obama + 5

21666212.png




Rasmussen- Obama + 2

69643233.png



Rasmussen- Obama + 1

 
Quote from jem:

ricter is going back to take drive by pot shots... since he can not argue with the polling logic.

the data is in the polls themselves... if you subtract out the 7- 11 points of from the dem column and put them back in the independent column... you realize Romney has about a 5 to 7 point lead in a sample which would look like the 2010 election -- which was 35D/35R/30I
The thing is, you don't sound like a guy who is sure.
 
No pot shots from me, and thank you Jem for being man enough to actually make a decent bet for charity with me.

The rest of the all noise, no backbone guys, come on, I want take advantage of the obvious, Obama's winning numbers.

Come on, not even a few bucks?

Yeah, more crickets, not one true believer except for Jem.
 
Quote from mrbill:

No pot shots from me, and thank you Jem for being man enough to actually make a decent bet for charity with me.

The rest of the all noise, no backbone guys, come on, I want take advantage of the obvious, Obama's winning numbers.

Come on, not even a few bucks?

Yeah, more crickets, not one true believer except for Jem.

Why would anyone, let alone a "real trader", take the other side of an "obvious" loser?
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Why would anyone, let alone a "real trader", take the other side of an "obvious" loser?

OK then, I understand that you know Romney is the obvious loser. Fair enough. As a real trader, I just have to exploit the edges when I see them.

Ok, Lucrum now understands that the race is not to the swift, but it's still the way to bet, or not bet. Ok by me.
 
Back
Top