Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows Mitt Romney earning 47% of the vote while President Obama picks up support from 45%. Four percent (4%) would vote for a third party candidate, while three percent (3%) are undecided...

...

The race is close in key battleground states. Obama leads by four in Ohio. Romney is up two in North Carolina and up by just a single point in both Virginia and Florida.


...
Fifty-five percent (55%) of Likely U.S. Voters nationwide favor repeal of the president’s national health care law, consistent with surveys since the law’s passage in March 2010. Fifty-six percent (56%) expect the law to drive up health care costs.


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...ministration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
 
Quote from atticus:

fwiw, I didn't see the intrade price until after the bet, but I knew Obama was favored.

yeah I assumed obama was favored as well, but not by that much lol. I was thinking more like 5% or so.. probably from all the polls AK keeps posting.
 
Quote from Brass:

A chronology:

If you go back to the first half of this thread, you will find that I was the first one to suggest a bet in the first place. I challenged jem, because I was sick of his trash talking and his posting in P&R in general. I offered anyone upt to a full ET ban forever bet, and then inquired with Joe to see if ET would enforce it (IPs and so on, meaning a new user name wouldn't cut it). And even before Joe declined, jem and everyone else had waffled out, but didn't stop the trash talking. At that juncture, my point was already made.

Enter the Piggy (that would be you) with his multi-faceted offer. I told you from the get-go I was not interested in doing tricks for your entertainment. And when Joe subsequently advised me by PM that he would not enforce, I opted out from my offer, before you accepted (since you never actually accepted), because I don't trust any of you Far Right Wing bad haircuts to live up to your end of the deal, judging by your complete lack of honesty and integrity, conveniently, but not exclusively, exhibited right here in this thread for our viewing pleasure. You then accused me of chickening out, and so I accepted your bet (the BET part) just to shut you up, despite Joe's decision. And now you and your idiot henchmen accuse me of backing out?

And to highlight the sheer stupidity of entertaining your dare, you advised earlier today that if you thought I gamed the test you would disregard the results. So it's a foregone conclusion as far as you're concerned, and my actually taking the test is rendered moot because you already "know" the outcome.

But, hey, thanks for letting us tour and plumb the depths of your mental disorder. And a special thanks for letting me have the window seat.

Just more nonsense from thunderpussy.. your chronology, like everything else you post, is twisted to suit you. I made you a bet that you accepted. taking the test was part of the bet, and obvious for any literate human being. I also posted later that even if I thought you were lying our bet would stand.. I would just make fun of you for cheating on a test that is based on honesty. I never accepted your bet because YOU TOOK MINE. You don't make any sense. You can't accept what YOU consider 'the BET part' when there is more to it. That isn't how it works asshole.

You can try every excuse from every angle but the fact is and will remain that I am right and you are wrong, you keep changing your story and mine just stays the same. I have other bets with other guys, and RCG has almost the same bet that you did and he didn't take whatever "part" he wanted but actually took the bet, you just bitched out.
 
Quote from Brass:

You are a complete and utter waste of time. But I'm sure you've heard that before. Often.

I haven't been following this but my judgement of it this......


whoever was wearing the hoodie is guilty. Obviously.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

yeah I assumed obama was favored as well, but not by that much lol. I was thinking more like 5% or so.. probably from all the polls AK keeps posting.

Polls don't reflect the true prob. of winning a binary event.
 
Quote from Brass:

You are a complete and utter waste of time. But I'm sure you've heard that before. Often.

You are the biggest pussy and troll on this board. I am certain that you hear that constantly. Every single day.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Mitt Romney’s road to presidency this fall looks narrow on electoral map
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-map/2012/04/29/gIQAHxz7pT_story.html?hpid=z2

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-map/2012/04/29/gIQAHxz7pT_story.html?hpid=z2

Under the 2012 map, Romney would win 292 electoral votes if he replicated the Bush 2004 victory. But New Mexico seems like a very tough place to win — not to mention the fact that he would again need to carry Ohio, Florida, Colorado and Nevada as well as North Carolina and Virginia.





So Mitt has to win New Mexico,Ohio, Florida, Colorado , Nevada,North Carolina and Virginia ? Lets see how its looking in those states



111tbo.png



222hj.png



333as.png



444fb.png



555wt.png



666wr.png
 
Back
Top