Romney Looks Like the Next Pres

Quote from jem:

Rasmussen Tracking 6/4 - 6/6 1500 LV 46 46 Tie
Gallup Tracking 5/30 - 6/5 3050 RV 46 45 Obama +1
CNN/Opinion Research 5/29 - 5/31 895 RV 49 46 Obama +3
Pew Research 5/9 - 6/3 2388 RV 49 42 Obama +7
ABC News/Wash Post 5/17 - 5/20 874 RV 49 46 Obama +3
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 5/16 - 5/20 RV 47 43 Obama +4
Rasmussen Reports 5/14 - 5/16 1500 LV 45 46 Romney +1
Gallup 5/11 - 5/17 3050 RV 45 46 Romney +1
FOX News 5/13 - 5/15 913 RV 46 39 Obama +7
IBD/CSM/TIPP 5/9 - 5/16 778 RV 43 40 Obama +3
Mason-Dixon 5/10 - 5/14 1000 LV 44 47 Romney +3
CBS News/NY Times** 5/11 - 5/13 562 RV 43 46 Romney +3
Wash Times/JZ Analytics 5/11 - 5/12 800 LV 43 44 Romney +1
Gallup 5/3 - 5/9 3000 RV 44 47 Romney +3

Add about 10 points to Romney's numbers to account for the exit-poll offset observed in the Walker race and you've got a reasonably accurate picture of the race.
 
Ungrateful bastards! Don't they know Obama single-handedly saved the auto industry.

Poll: Barack Obama in dead heat with Mitt Romney in Michigan as popularity slips

June 7, 2012

President Barack Obama’s popularity in Michigan has slipped in recent months, leaving him in a dead heat with Republican challenger Mitt Romney, according to a new poll of state voters by EPIC-MRA of Lansing.

The poll, released this morning to the Free Press and four TV stations, shows Romney leading Obama 46%-45%, a reversal from the last EPIC poll in April which showed Obama ahead 47%-43%.

Obama’s personal and job approval numbers also have slipped, with 46% of Michiganders saying they have a favorable opinion of the president, and 41% approving of the job he’s doing.

EPIC co-founder John Cavanagh said the softening in support for Obama is likely related to a robust TV advertising campaign by pro-Romney PACs which have been critical of his handling of the economy. Perhaps most troubling for the Democratic president is a decline in support from independent voters, Cavanagh said.

The EPIC results are in sharp contrast to a poll by North Carolina-based Public Policy Polling late last month which showed Obama leading Romney in Michigan 53%-39%, prompting PPP Director Tom Jensen to suggest the president “won’t have to worry too much about holding Michigan for Democrats” in the fall.

Romney, however, also remains unpopular with many voters (43%), compared to 41% who view him favorably.

EPIC asked poll respondents as well how their views might be affected by Obama’s recent announcement of support for same-sex marriage, and Romney’s opposition to the federal government bailouts of the auto industry. Same sex marriage prompted 12% to say they would be more likely to vote for Obama, while 34% said they would be less likely. Romney’s position on federal aid to GM and Chrysler made 18% of voters more likely to support him, and 39% less likely.

Asked what their presidential preference would be in light of those positions, the head-to-head results flipped, with Obama ahead 46%-45%.

Both are well within the poll’s margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The telephone survey of 600 likely voters was conducted June 2-5.

http://www.freep.com/article/201206...ad-heat-Mitt-Romney-Michigan-popularity-slips
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

Add about 10 points to Romney's numbers to account for the exit-poll offset observed in the Walker race and you've got a reasonably accurate picture of the race.

good point.

amazing co incidence with the thesis of this thread... the polls are off by 7 - 11 points.
 
Gary Johnson was on the tube this morning.Says he going to be on 47 state ballots,He's getting matching federal campaign funds and polling at 8 % in the polls that include him against Obama and Romney
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Gary Johnson was on the tube this morning.Says he going to be on 47 state ballots,He's getting matching federal campaign funds and polling at 8 % in the polls that include him against Obama and Romney

I thought Gary Johnson had a compelling message.
In fact I adopted here on et.
0 income tax.
This may make Romney better, but it may take away some of his vote.
I hope it makes his message better..

0 income tax.
 
http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/pres...ile-visiting-new-hampshire-business-incubator

Endorsed by many U.S. economists, the FairTax Plan is designed to collect the revenue needed for the federal government from a broader tax base at a lower effective rate than the current system of taxing income. Taxpayers and businesses would pay no federal income or payroll taxes, but would pay a 23% tax on goods and services they buy. A “prebate” would be granted to all taxpayers, regardless of income, to offset payment of the FairTax on purchases of necessities up to the federal poverty level.

Johnson said, “There are many ways to describe our current 70,000 page tax code, but ‘fair’ is not one of them.

“It is simple economic common sense that the most equitable and sustainable system for providing the tax revenues we need is one which places the burden on the broadest base at the lowest possible rate. Taxing income runs fundamentally counter to that goal, and it creates perverse incentives that stifle economic growth and kill jobs. Changing to a system which taxes consumption, rather than earnings, will encourage savings and investment, provide American families more freedom to spend their hard-earned money as they choose, and put people back to work.”

Johnson continued, “With the ‘prebate’ provision of the FairTax, no one will pay taxes on expenditures for basic necessities, and the average taxpayer will pay a smaller portion of their income in federal taxes than they are now. The result is an equitable tax that is progressive on the basis not of income, but lifestyle and spending choice
 
Quote from jem:

http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/pres...ile-visiting-new-hampshire-business-incubator

Endorsed by many U.S. economists, the FairTax Plan is designed to collect the revenue needed for the federal government from a broader tax base at a lower effective rate than the current system of taxing income. Taxpayers and businesses would pay no federal income or payroll taxes, but would pay a 23% tax on goods and services they buy. A “prebate” would be granted to all taxpayers, regardless of income, to offset payment of the FairTax on purchases of necessities up to the federal poverty level.

Johnson said, “There are many ways to describe our current 70,000 page tax code, but ‘fair’ is not one of them.

“It is simple economic common sense that the most equitable and sustainable system for providing the tax revenues we need is one which places the burden on the broadest base at the lowest possible rate. Taxing income runs fundamentally counter to that goal, and it creates perverse incentives that stifle economic growth and kill jobs. Changing to a system which taxes consumption, rather than earnings, will encourage savings and investment, provide American families more freedom to spend their hard-earned money as they choose, and put people back to work.”

Johnson continued, “With the ‘prebate’ provision of the FairTax, no one will pay taxes on expenditures for basic necessities, and the average taxpayer will pay a smaller portion of their income in federal taxes than they are now. The result is an equitable tax that is progressive on the basis not of income, but lifestyle and spending choice

Sounds good, but the bleeding heart liberals don't want a fair tax or a simple tax code. They want wealth redistribution and tax anarchy.
 
I like the message because stealing a mans earnings is wrong... whether you are a fraud or an arm of the govt this is not justification for stealing a mans earnings.
 
Back
Top