RNC SAYS DELEGATES NOT BOUND TO PRIMARY VOTES

[Snarkhund]

But before I go... I also note that I have counselors on the radio explain women like to speak 30,000 words a day and men 10,000.

The actuals are higher, women are compelled to speak on average 75,000 words per day, men 25,000 but yeah roughly 3:1.

When my woman is hitting me with my daily 75,000 words I'm always trying to stop her and ask "what do you want me to do?" because men are looking for something actionable and her response is always "I just want you to listen" meaning you are somehow obligated to process those 75,000 words and not required to reach any conclusion or to take any action.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

if that is addressed to me

If you were to follow the dots, you would see that it was not.

 

[Snarkhund]

If you were to follow the dots, you would see that it was not.

Good Lord stop with the shopworn "connect the dots" or "pot meet kettle" or "rock meet hard place".

You've been trotting out the same un-clever phrases for years each time still believing they are witty.

They aren't.

Try saying something you thought of for once. I can't think of anyone here more pedantic.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Good Lord

If nothing else, your salutation will do.

 

[Ricter]

if that is addressed to me fuuuuuuuck you..

It wasn't, so stopped reading there.

 

[achilles28]

Well, looks like he won three states. Maybe four.

Ohio goes to Kasich. Rubio out.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Good Lord stop with the shopworn "connect the dots" or "pot meet kettle" or "rock meet hard place".

You've been trotting out the same un-clever phrases for years each time still believing they are witty.

They aren't.

Try saying something you thought of for once. I can't think of anyone here more pedantic.

Don't forget the grammar lessons. Or the "How To Spot a Metaphor by Freddie Foresight". Or that the word "and" can limit what Freddie was referring to, especially if it's convenient. Or how to replace content with snark for debate purposes (especially using snark to belittle the intelligence of your opponent). Or how to return under a new sockpuppet when ousted from the site. Or how to point out when people don't criticize folks on the right for what the left does (despite having no proof of ever criticizing the left for a single thing, ever). Or.....

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Don't forget the grammar lessons. Or the "How To Spot a Metaphor by Freddie Foresight". Or that the word "and" can limit what Freddie was referring to, especially if it's convenient. Or how to replace content with snark for debate purposes (especially using snark to belittle the intelligence of your opponent). Or how to return under a new sockpuppet when ousted from the site. Or how to point out when people don't criticize folks on the right for what the left does (despite having no proof of ever criticizing the left for a single thing, ever). Or.....

Aww...I must have upset you significantly if you're resorting to personal attacks right off the mark in the morning. Still butt hurt from yesterday?

 

[Tsing Tao]

I was only using metaphor in that second quote. That makes it all better!

 

[JamesL]

We choose the nominee, not the voters: Senior GOP official


http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/16/we-choose-the-nominee-not-the-voters-senior-gop-official.html