RNC SAYS DELEGATES NOT BOUND TO PRIMARY VOTES

With Hillary's e-mailgate, Ted Cruz's birther issues and Trump riding on a cart of dynamite there are probably a half dozen people who could be sworn in next January.

Kasich has a real path if he wins Ohio, as the Trump delegates in a brokered convention are going to have to vote for someone if Trump can't put together a majority. Kasich has feuded less with Trump than anyone else.
 
Where were we until now? Was there another similar attempt to steal a nomination from a candidate with so much popular support that I'm not aware of?
But "the process" was in place well before that. Perhaps you and yours should have dissented when cooler heads prevailed and the matter was more abstract. Because, after all, you are a man of process.
 
But "the process" was in place well before that. Perhaps you and yours should have dissented when cooler heads prevailed and the matter was more abstract. Because, after all, you are a man of process.

Give it a fucking rest, already, Fred. The note was sent out informing delegates of a little known loophole in the process. If you had bothered to read the document, you'd have seen the person who sent out the note actually wrote this:

Here is something I recently discovered that most of us did not know, including
me!

The fact is there are probably tons of little sub articles and footnotes to the process, none of which have been used before because there's never been a situation where the party was so upset at the possibility of the candidate being nominated that they'd go to whatever lengths to deny him it, and ignore the votes of the registered party voters.

So if you're going to sit there an nitpick the fact that I was not aware of the fact they could do this, so fucking what? Were you? Do us all a favor and cut your wrists in the shower, because all you're doing now is trying to pick a fight and troll.
 
Give it a fucking rest, already, Fred. The note was sent out informing delegates of a little known loophole in the process. If you had bothered to read the document, you'd have seen the person who sent out the note actually wrote this:

Here is something I recently discovered that most of us did not know, including
me!

The fact is there are probably tons of little sub articles and footnotes to the process, none of which have been used before because there's never been a situation where the party was so upset at the possibility of the candidate being nominated that they'd go to whatever lengths to deny him it, and ignore the votes of the registered party voters.

So if you're going to sit there an nitpick the fact that I was not aware of the fact they could do this, so fucking what? Were you? Do us all a favor and cut your wrists in the shower, because all you're doing now is trying to pick a fight and troll.
Aww...I must have upset you significantly if you're resorting to personal attacks right off the mark in the morning. Still butt hurt from yesterday?

Apart from that little look in the mirror for you, process is process. And you are a self-declared man of process:
The process is more important to me.
 
Apart from that little look in the mirror for you, process is process. And you are a self-declared man of process:

As usual, any discussion attempt is absolutely worthless as you focus on conjunctions, adverbs, missing subtext, etc. That's your only contribution to society - a 57 year old fag hag living in Canada, unemployed and all alone, and archiving posts on a trading forum he was banned at multiple times and used multiple usernames just so he can find the one "t" that's not crossed, or the one "i" not dotted and yell to the world "HAAAA! I TOLD YOU!!"

I crap bigger than you.
 
As usual, any discussion attempt is absolutely worthless as you focus on conjunctions, adverbs, missing subtext, etc. That's your only contribution to society - a 57 year old fag hag living in Canada, unemployed and all alone, and archiving posts on a trading forum he was banned at multiple times and used multiple usernames just so he can find the one "t" that's not crossed, or the one "i" not dotted and yell to the world "HAAAA! I TOLD YOU!!"

I crap bigger than you.
I express my ideas through language. Apart from "crapping big" (your words), I'm not quite sure what you do.
 
fag hag?
freddie is a women?
that would explain why I don't understand how he could think that way?
And, after 20 years of marriage and a bit of marriage counseling I say that with respect, not as a put down.
 
Back
Top