You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Richard Dawkins, Famed Atheist, Supports Free Bibles In Schools
- Thread starter Free Thinker
- Start date
the catholic church has good reason not to allow modern testing. they know. what do you think they know?Quote from jem:
I would like to see new carbon testing done.
[/B]
For three hundred years now, the Christian astronomer has known that his Diety didn't make the stars in those tremendous six days; but the Christian astronomer doesn't enlarge upon that detail. Neither does the priest.
Samuel Clemens- Letters from the Earth
Nearly right.Quote from jem:
I present videos and whole papers. I present famous scientist's opinions.
You troll one truncated video like a demented bot and repeatedly confuse what is actually being said in one paper with something made up. You misrepresent scientists and science trying to infer a religious message that doesn't belong.
Otherwise.... it's fair to say, you couldn't be more wrong in any case.
Quote from stu:
Nearly right.
You troll one truncated video like a demented bot and repeatedly confuse what is actually being said in one paper with something made up. You misrepresent scientists and science trying to infer a religious message that doesn't belong.
Otherwise.... it's fair to say, you couldn't be more wrong in any case.
Truncated video... which is supported by Penrose's work on the subject.
What troll b.s.... you cant show that video is out of context.
I present definitive videos and papers on the subject and you troll.
You state there is no appearance of fine tunings and that a Creator is not an option... I present to you one of the founders of string theory and the guy who wrote the book on string theory and the multiverse as an explanation for the fine tunings...
----
Suskind states here are 4 possibilities to explain the knife's edge fine tuning...
1. God (that is correct... susskind says it)
2. luck
3. megaverse/ multiverse
4. someday find a theory of everything.
http://www.closertotruth.com/video-...d-Susskind-/431
The video is truncated obviously to give the wrong impression.Quote from jem:
Truncated video... which is supported by Penrose's work on the subject.
Penrose's work and what he is saying on the subject proposes a cyclic universe, explaining any questions of fine tuning.
Susskind's book is sub titled "String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design". "(that is correct... susskind says it)"Quote from jem:
You state there is no appearance of fine tunings and that a Creator is not an option... I present to you one of the founders of string theory and the guy who wrote the book on string theory and the multiverse as an explanation for the fine tunings...
----
Suskind states here are 4 possibilities to explain the knife's edge fine tuning...
1. God (that is correct... susskind says it)
2. luck
3. megaverse/ multiverse
4. someday find a theory of everything.
1. God
has been declared an illusion by
3. megaverse/ multiverse
Trolling a list around won't change that .
Using Susskind as your authority, you have to take into consideration everything he says, not just bits you want to hear that might fit with your own religious pre-conclusions. Once you do that, you may stop being such a prick.
you are such a troll.
Penrose's work is consistent with the idea of incredible fine tuning.
Penrose's work on the subject even calls bullshit on the multiverse explanation.
He says the initial state is so special the multiverse can not even explain the fine tuning.
do you know what 10 to the 10 to the 123 even represents.
You are a complete fraud to suggest that video is not in context.
I cited to the math in one of our previous threads.
Suskind's video which I cited too numerous times on this thread states God is one of the 4 possible explanations for the fine tuning... one of the others is the multiverse. Susskind freely admits that... I can't figure out why you won't.
Penrose's work is consistent with the idea of incredible fine tuning.
Penrose's work on the subject even calls bullshit on the multiverse explanation.
He says the initial state is so special the multiverse can not even explain the fine tuning.
do you know what 10 to the 10 to the 123 even represents.
You are a complete fraud to suggest that video is not in context.
I cited to the math in one of our previous threads.
Suskind's video which I cited too numerous times on this thread states God is one of the 4 possible explanations for the fine tuning... one of the others is the multiverse. Susskind freely admits that... I can't figure out why you won't.
Quote from stu:
The video is truncated obviously to give the wrong impression.
Penrose's work and what he is saying on the subject proposes a cyclic universe, explaining any questions of fine tuning.
Susskind's book is sub titled "String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design". "(that is correct... susskind says it)"
1. God
has been declared an illusion by
3. megaverse/ multiverse
Trolling a list around won't change that .
Using Susskind as your authority, you have to take into consideration everything he says, not just bits you want to hear that might fit with your own religious pre-conclusions. Once you do that, you may stop being such a prick.