Researchers Think They Know Why College-Educated People Support The Tea Party

"Believe in the People" is my favorite.

Or let them die.

Whatever.

:cool:


I like this one "Avoid the Pitfalls of Politics"

LOL

They forgot to include "Eliminate the EPA"

and "Eliminate the social safety net"

and "We have ours, others can go scratch, praise the Lord"
 
Tea Party Movement goals, which are as follows:
1. Eliminate Excessive Taxes
2. Eliminate the National Debt
3. Eliminate Deficit Spending
4. Protect Free Markets
5. Abide by the Constitution of the United States
6. Promote Civic Responsibility
7. Reduce the Overall Size of Government
8. Believe in the People
9. Avoid the Pitfalls of Politics
10. Maintain Local Independence

If a party did ANY of the 1st 5, that would be deserving of a patriot's vote. (Of course, the antithesis of the Tea Party agenda... is the party(s) who say, "We're not going to do any of that".)
 
I guess the leftist drones did not see the point about people getting jobs when unemployment benefits ran out.

there is a line between social safety net and crippling your constituents into being a permanent underclass.

Workfare over welfare for able bodied people and a slow phase down of of benefits to lower levels is a much better way to do things for the benefit of the citizens in need and tax payers.
 
I guess the leftist drones did not see the point about people getting jobs when unemployment benefits ran out.

there is a line between social safety net and crippling your constituents into being a permanent underclass.

Workfare over welfare for able bodied people and a slow phase down of of benefits to lower levels is a much better way to do things for the benefit of the citizens in need and tax payers.

Last I saw, even now there are more job applicants (3 to 1?) than there are job openings. And I like the idea of workfare, but we don't have it yet.
 
Last I saw, even now there are more job applicants (3 to 1?) than there are job openings. And I like the idea of workfare, but we don't have it yet.


Whi is it that the first six months in a row with 200k+ job growth just so happened to coincide with the end of unemployment benefits? Didnt you keynesians tell us unemployment benefits create jobs?
 
Whi is it that the first six months in a row with 200k+ job growth just so happened to coincide with the end of unemployment benefits? Didnt you keynesians tell us unemployment benefits create jobs?

You're implying hundreds of thousands of job openings remained unfilled for years, until those benefits were reduced. So we should have seen rising compensation offers as firms bid to fill those open positions.
 
You're implying hundreds of thousands of job openings remained unfilled for years, until those benefits were reduced. So we should have seen rising compensation offers as firms bid to fill those open positions.

Firms only pay a wage that is economic. That they can make a profit from.

Basic economics is tough to grasp, right?
 
I think that's covered under 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7.

Praise Jesus.


Republicans give to charity. The fag commie left thinks they are giving to charity when they give someone else's money to the poor just like they think they are having normal sex when they stick their wang up their boyfriend's butt.
 
Back
Top