Republican Trump says 70 percent of federal regulations 'can go'

Losing argument? I'm not arguing with you. I'm merely criticizing your politically correct liberal views. It's a matter of preferences; there is no right or wrong; winning or losing; you have your views and I have mine.
It's OK in ISIS land to kill someone because they converted to Christianity, that's not a "matter of preference", "no right or wrong", "they have their beliefs and we have ours" kind of thing, that's just wrong. I'm guessing from your previous posts that you're not arguing some kind of moral relativism both because you don't appear to have studied it and seem to disagree with the tenants. So yes, there is a right and wrong.

You are expressing views that are racist, sexist, and bigoted. All those things are wrong. Wrong in the sense that they're morally wrong in almost any belief system, wrong in simply the sense of common human decency, and legally wrong in the U.S. because there are a number of laws that prohibit discrimination. You don't get to prefer to discriminate based on race or sex here. If you'd like to live in a society that allows that there are a number of Muslim countries you can attempt to immigrate to, and I heard ISIS will take almost anyone at this point. You and your type are not welcome in the United States.
 
It's OK in ISIS land to kill someone because they converted to Christianity, that's not a "matter of preference", "no right or wrong", "they have their beliefs and we have ours" kind of thing, that's just wrong. I'm guessing from your previous posts that you're not arguing some kind of moral relativism both because you don't appear to have studied it and seem to disagree with the tenants. So yes, there is a right and wrong.

You are expressing views that are racist, sexist, and bigoted. All those things are wrong. Wrong in the sense that they're morally wrong in almost any belief system, wrong in simply the sense of common human decency, and legally wrong in the U.S. because there are a number of laws that prohibit discrimination. You don't get to prefer to discriminate based on race or sex here. If you'd like to live in a society that allows that there are a number of Muslim countries you can attempt to immigrate to, and I heard ISIS will take almost anyone at this point. You and your type are not welcome in the United States.

So because I disagree with your views I should leave this country? Haha go back to your basement bud.
 
So because I disagree with your views I should leave this country? Haha go back to your basement bud.
I've got a nice bar and rec room down there so I just may stop by for a drink later on. Not sure what that has to do with your bigoted rants any more than the streets of Detroit, but your kind of hate is clearly not the thing of rational minds so I'll leave you to stew in it.
 
I've got a nice bar and rec room down there so I just may stop by for a drink later on. Not sure what that has to do with your bigoted rants any more than the streets of Detroit, but your kind of hate is clearly not the thing of rational minds so I'll leave you to stew in it.

Hate is rational and normal. What's not normal is liberal fantasies of equality for everyone. Women aren't equal to men. All races aren't equal to each other. So when you generalize like you do, you look like a fool. Racism, misogyny, etc are all normal. To be in denial that it isn't part of human nature...well that's called liberalism. Liberalism is a system of beliefs on par with most religions. I.e. It's made up and not true
 
Hate is rational and normal....All races aren't equal to each other.

Qxr1011, still gonna defend your boy as not racist, just pointing out "differences"? It's a sad world this guy lives in, if he wasn't so repulsive I'd almost feel a little bad for him.
 
Qxr1011, still gonna defend your boy as not racist, just pointing out "differences"? It's a sad world this guy lives in, if he wasn't so repulsive I'd almost feel a little bad for him.

What's wrong with racism and misogyny? Hmm? You can't even comprehend these topics.
 
The Red Tape Conundrum
How the wrong kind of regulation is strangling business—and what to do about it.

It may well be the biggest bogeyman in business—bigger, perhaps, than even taxes: We’re talking, of course, about red tape. The idea that burdensome and overly complicated government regulation is strangling growth is almost as old as commerce itself. But right now the hue and cry from the business community is louder than at just about any time in recent memory.

Concern about regulation is soaring among executives. In a recent survey by Deloitte, North American chief financial officers named new, burdensome regulation as the No. 2 threat to their business, behind only the possibility of a recession. When the National Federation of Independent Business, which represents 325,000 small U.S. companies, conducted its quadrennial survey earlier this year, its members identified “unreasonable government regulations” as the second-biggest threat, after rising health care costs. And for a fourth year in a row, the CEOs surveyed by the Business Roundtable for its annual economic outlook cited regulation as the top cost pressure facing their companies.

Red tape has emerged as a major talking point in the presidential campaign—with each candidate approaching the topic in characteristic fashion. Hillary Clinton has promised to be the “small-business President” and has wonkishly outlined plans to cut red tape by streamlining the startup process for entrepreneurs and expanding access to credit through community banks and credit unions.

Donald Trump, meanwhile, has taken a more shoot-from-the-hip approach. The Republican nominee has vowed to roll back many of the new regulations enacted under President Obama, including environmental standards designed to address climate change. Trump’s campaign has proposed a 10% overall reduction in regulations. But the candidate himself has at times suggested a more sweeping overhaul. On the same day that a videotape from 2005 surfaced showing Trump bragging about his aggressive sexual behavior—a revelation that sent his poll numbers crashing—the nominee cavalierly told a crowd at a town hall in New Hampshire that he would eliminate the majority of federal agency regulations if elected. “I would say 70% of regulations can go,” Trump said. “It’s just stopping businesses from growing.”...

http://fortune.com/red-tape-business-regulations/
 
Back
Top