Republican Trump says 70 percent of federal regulations 'can go'

By your logic, I should be totally ok with walking the streets of Detroit alone at night because otherwise I'm a prejudist racist! Liberalism is cancer. And you're barking up the wrong tree.
I think we need to add the word "logic" to those that don't mean what you apparently think they mean.

Lets go back to your words. You said, in this thread "first it was the first black president, now it looks to be the first woman president, and i'm basically expecting a transgender president in the next 10-20 years with the way things are unfolding

it's truly the blind leading the blind"
Those are your words, they are racist, prejudice, bigoted and inexcusable. No matter what kind of tortured "logic" you apply to them or anyone else on these threads attempts to defend them.
 
I think we need to add the word "logic" to those that don't mean what you apparently think they mean.

Lets go back to your words. You said, in this thread "first it was the first black president, now it looks to be the first woman president, and i'm basically expecting a transgender president in the next 10-20 years with the way things are unfolding

it's truly the blind leading the blind"
Those are your words, they are racist, prejudice, bigoted and inexcusable. No matter what kind of tortured "logic" you apply to them or anyone else on these threads attempts to defend them.


hold on here

the emphasis on the skin color, the gender where pushed by the left: oh first black president, oh first woman president , oh we making history !!

so to expect that soon they will push transgender is not far fetch at all, absolutely logical and nothing racists or bigoted here...

left is promoting symbolism instead of electing people based on merit

and when someone pointing on that immediately he is called bunch of names that you just listed
 
Because the "opponent" is not keeping up with Sig's argument. I'm not going to do it for him.

that is not a reason to start discussing his abilities or calling him names

we either should stick to civil discussion or put person in ignore list and do not talk with him, otherwise this may escalate very quickly to simple "f@ck you" which everybody comprehend..

but do we need it?
 
that is not a reason to start discussing his abilities or calling him names

we either should stick to civil discussion or put person in ignore list and do not talk with him, otherwise this may escalate very quickly to simple "f@ck you" which everybody comprehend..

but do we need it?
What names did I call him?

If he can't hold up his end of a (losing) argument, then that's his problem. If he doesn't even understand Sig's point, then there is little point in continuing the discourse. That was my point. It ended there.
 
I can see a lot of trouble between Trump, assuming he is elected, and Congress. As a hero worshipper of Putin, Trump will undoubtably try to over rule Congress just as Putin does with the Duma. Obama has complained that congress wouldn't let him do as he liked and probably in hindsight it was just as well.
The US system seemed to be designed to stop potential dictators getting their own way.
 
What names did I call him?

If he can't hold up his end of a (losing) argument, then that's his problem. If he doesn't even understand Sig's point, then there is little point in continuing the discourse. That was my point. It ended there.

Losing argument? I'm not arguing with you. I'm merely criticizing your politically correct liberal views. It's a matter of preferences; there is no right or wrong; winning or losing; you have your views and I have mine.
 
Back
Top