Republican Jewish Coalition Bars Ron Paul From Debate: ‘He’s misguided and extreme’

Quote from rew:

I think Paul could defeat Obama, something the Republicans absolutely refuse to acknowledge. Paul's greatest impediment to reaching the Presidency is the large number of war mongers in his own party. Romney is an empty shell, and I think more people are realizing that. Love him or hate him, people know where Paul stands, and know that he means what he says.

And yes Cain has just announced that he's out of the race, due to his own bimbo explosion. So now the anybody-but-Ron-Paul segment of the Republican party is switching to the inside beltway slime ball, Newt Gingrich. This is the best thing that could have happened for Obama.

Paul would definitely defeat Obama, but he will not get the chance to run. He is being pushed to go third party, but he does know that a divided GOP will not defeat a united Dem party.

And, yet, as some point, someone will have to break away from the two Party system. Paul would take the youth vote from both parties and all the Constitutionalists. The Tea Party and the Occupiers would both choose Paul. Maybe he should run.

The Indies will never support Eye of Newt. Newt will make it close as he will carry all of the South and probably the Mountain West, but the Northeast, Midwest and Pacific West all belong to Obama now.

Mittens had the chance to split the Northeast and Midwest, which would make the South the battleground. This would be dangerous electorially for Obama, because if Mittens were to carry, say, Ohio. Obama would almost have to carry Florida or Texas.

Now, the Southern Strategy is back into full effect. Good luck with that, GOP
 
Quote from fixedgrin88:

who cares about mainstream republican views when they do not reflect mainstream american views? and wtf are jews talking about the mainstream for? they are certainly not a majority in this country.
Deport the Jews, problem solved.
 
Quote from pspr:


I didn't call YOU a kook, although after reading some of your posts it was obvious to me that you are.
[/b]
Many of Ron Paul's Kooky ideas are NOT questions of Constitutionality. For instance, Ron Paul would not have ordered the raid on Bin Laden. Doing so was not un-Constitionional.

Of course I do (now I will resort to your level) you moron. The things that make Ron Paul a kook are not necessarily related to the constitution. Now go to bed. I hear your mommy calling you. [/B]

Oh yeah, bring someone's mother into it you fucking retarded cocksucker . Piece of shit like yourself is rare ...
 
Quote from Hombre:

Oh yeah, bring someone's mother into it you fucking retarded cocksucker . Piece of shit like yourself is rare ...

Clearly the republicans think Ron Paul is a kook. He should have run as a Demokook. We'll see what kind of republican Ron Paul is when he goes independent and hands the election to Obama.

Ralph Nader, Ross Perot, Ron Paul...all kooks and all democrats at heart.
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

Clearly the republicans think Ron Paul is a kook. He should have run as a Demokook. We'll see what kind of republican Ron Paul is when he goes independent and hands the election to Obama.

Ralph Nader, Ross Perot, Ron Paul...all kooks and all democrats at heart.

Ron Paul, who votes against spending more than any other Republican, is a Democrat? You could have fooled me. It's sad when the criteria for being a Republican is that you have to be a blood thirsty war monger, and in favor of repealing the Bill of Rights for the sake of "Getting the terrorists!".
 
Ron Paul is a kook for his position on Iran alone. Iran is THE most active state sponsor of terrorism, so unless you think it's a good idea for terrorists to get nuclear weapons...

Sorry anti-semites... "the Jewzzz" are not the problem. You and your ilk are.
 
Quote from a_person:

I am not an Obama supporter by any stretch of imagination, chances are I will vote for any republican candidate opposing him (with the exception of Ron Paul of course:) )

Nevertheless neither of us is qualified to decide whether Obama has violated the constitution. That's exactly what I am talking about neither of us has nearly enough knowledge to make such determination. If you believe Obama broke the law - sue him or get him impeached. And if you can't or know that you will fail - STFU

And look inside yourself honestly, when was the last time you read the constitution? 3 years ago in middle school I bet. How can you possibly know whether it was or was not broken? Ron Paul told you? But I don't think even Ron Paul accuses Obama of violating the constitution. I might be wrong though, I don't follow him closely, perhaps he does.
[/QUOTE

Wow, you are a full blown retard.
There are a lot of retards in the thread, but you my friend, are LORD of the Retards!

Go learn about what Ron Paul has stood for these last 30 plus years. Check his voting record. There is no more Conservative member in Congress than Dr. Paul. If I'm not mistaken, America could use a heavy dose of his Constitutionalist Conservatism.

No undeclared wars, bring our troops home from the 900 bases around the world, shutter the IRS and dismantle the Fed. No more bailouts. End the warfare and welfare state. Sound money. Free markets. Follow the Rule of Law.

Anyone opposed to these ideas is purely un-American.
 
If we went back on the gold standard, would we all carry around leather sacks with gold flakes in them, or would we carry gold certificates printed by the government?
 
Quote from Trader666:

Ron Paul is a kook for his position on Iran alone. Iran is THE most active state sponsor of terrorism, so unless you think it's a good idea for terrorists to get nuclear weapons...

Sorry anti-semites... "the Jewzzz" are not the problem. You and your ilk are.

You are a kook if you think that Iran, even if it had nuclear weapons, would give them to terrorists. Did the U.S. give nukes to the Contras?

If Hezbollah fires off a nuke the entire world will treat it exactly as if Iran had set it off -- and Iran would be turned into radioactive glass. The leadership of Iran knows this, so they're not going to be stupid enough to hand out nukes to hotheads.
 
Quote from rew:

... The leadership of Iran knows this, so they're not going to be stupid enough to hand out nukes to hotheads.
I certainly hope you're right, but jihadist rag heads have been known to do some pretty stupid things in the past.
 
Back
Top