Remote Viewing & Trading

For entertainment I dug up this. An 'expert' remote viewer (Ingo Swann) in 1973 supposedly took a trip to Jupiter as part of research done at Stanford. He found sand dunes and mountains, except there is just one problem, Jupiter is a gas giant without a solid surface. Ooops, he later backpedaled and said he must have been on another planet. Yes, these jackwagons are on another planet, I agree.

The power of self delusion is unlimited in humans, but by all means trade away based upon your remotely viewed price charts of tomorrow.


Swann | Jupiter probe

(April 27, 1973)

Experiment 46


No big sharp noises for the next 1/2 hour please.

6:03:25 (3 seconds fast) There's a planet with stripes.

6:04:13 I hope it's Jupiter. I think that it must have an extremely large hydrogen mantle. If a space probe made contact with that, it would be maybe 80,000 - 120,000 miles out from the planet surface.

6:06 So I'm approaching it on the tangent where I can see it's a half moon, in other words half lit half dark. If I move around to the lit side it's distinctly yellow toward the right. (Hal - Which direction you had to move?)

6:06:20 Very high in the atmosphere there are crystals, they glitter, maybe the stripes are like bands of crystals, maybe like rings of Saturn, though not far out like that, very close within the atmosphere. ["Note": see sketch of ring in the raw data drawing ahead.] (Unintelligible sentence.) I bet you they'll reflect radio probes. Is that possible if you had a cloud of crystals that were assaulted by different radio waves? (Hal - That's right.)

6:08:00 Now I'll go down through. It feels really good there (laugh). I said that before, didn't I? Inside those cloud layers, those crystal layers, they look beautiful from the outside, from the inside they look like rolling gas clouds - eerie yellow light, rainbows.

6:10:20 I get the impression, thought I don't see, that it's liquid. 6:10:55 Then I came through the cloud cover, the surface it looks like sand dunes. They're made of very large grade crystals so they slide. Tremendous winds sort of like maybe the prevailing winds of earth, but very close to the surface of Jupiter. From that view the horizon looks orangish or rose-colored but overhead it's kind of greenish-yellow.

6:12:35 If I look to the right there is an enormous mountain range.

6:13:18 If I'm giving a description of where I've gone and am, it would be approximately where Alaska is if the sun were directly overhead which it is. The sun looks like it has a green corona, seems smaller to me. (Hal - What color is the sun?) White.

6:14:45 I feel that there's liquid somewhere. Those mountains are very huge but they still don't poke up through the crystal cloud cover. You know I had a dream once something like this where the cloud cover was a great arc, sweeps over the entire heaven. Those grains which make that sand orange are quite large. They have a polished surface and they look something like amber or like obsidian but they're yellowish and not as heavy. The wind blows them, they slide along.

6:16:37 If I turn, the whole thing seems enormously flat. I mean if I get the feeling that if a man stood on those sands I think he would sink into them (laugh); maybe that's where that liquid feeling comes from.

6:18:10 I see something that looks like a tornado. Is there a thermal inversion here? I bet there is. I bet you that the surface of Jupiter will give a very high infrared count (?), reading (?) (Hal - reading) (inaudible sentence). The heat is held down.

6:19:55 I seem to be stuck, not moving. I'll move more towards the equator. I get the impression that that must be a band of crystals similar to the outer ones, kind of bluish. They seem to be sort of in orbit, permanent orbit down through another layer farther down which are like our clouds but moving fast. There's another area: liquid like water. Looks like it's got icebergs in it but they're not icebergs.

6:22:20 Tremendous wind. It's colder here, maybe it's because there's not a thermal inversion there.

6:23:25 I'm back. OK.

The atmosphere of Jupiter is very thick. I mean ... (Ingo draws) ... Explanation of drawing: This is what appears to be a hydrogen mantle about 100,000 miles off the surface. Those here are bands of crystals, kind of elements. They're pretty close to the surface. And beneath those are layers of clouds or what seem to be prevailing winds. Beneath that is the surface which I saw was, well, it looked like shifting sands made out of some sort of slippery granulated stuff. And off in the distance, I guess, to the East was a very high mountain chain 30,000 feet or so, quite large mountains. I feel these crystals will probably bounce radio waves. They're that type.

Generally, that's all.
 
Kinda funny how all these scientists are just discovering things that spiritualists have practiced for thousands of years. They coat their discovery up with a lot of pseudoscience to make it sound scientific and valid. Yep... just thrown in some quantum mechanics and it all makes sense, right?

The truth is, all human beings are eternal spirit beings in a physical body. The spirit/soul are eternal. When a person dies, the soul leaves the body and goes to whichever kingdom it belongs to and stays there forever. Your mind, memories, and consciousness are kept intact even after death. That's why people with near death experiences see often see their bodies after dying and see those tunnels they enter into. Their souls were leaving their dying bodies.

With remote viewing and other spiritual things, you are "leaving the physical" bumping into the spirit realm. No need to throw quantum entanglement into it. Keep it simple. Chances are the complex-sounding pseudoscience to explain the spirit realm has no basis in reality. The architecture of the body-spirit-soul that God had created is still a mystery.
 
I am not a new-age mofo, mofo and UT-Austin isn't a wackadoo left-coast, Mav88, preschool.

I call time on my Aussie interest rate prediction. Experiment looks successful. Suck on that Vag88.
 
Vag88, those observations by Ingo Swann were proven correct with the Voyager flybys. Not every single one, but most of them.

The Vag88, read 'em and weep chart is coming up.
 
I am not a new-age mofo, mofo and UT-Austin isn't a wackadoo left-coast, Mav88, preschool.

I call time on my Aussie interest rate prediction. Experiment looks successful. Suck on that Vag88.

I said Philosphy degrees are bullshit, I don't care where they are from. I also do not give two shits about your interest rate buttsex-whatever, that is not an experiment. I called your bullshit on the quantum brain and you won't supply scientific evidence. I asked you explain your 'out of time' bs, you won't. Obviously your self promoted interent forum degree is worthless, you can't think.

btw, Mountains and sand dunes on jupiter and you think he's spot on- what a dumbass!
 
According to a Vedic religion:

There is no space and there is no time.

if there is no space then you can be anywhere you want to be in the universe.

If there is no time then you can be anywhere past, present or future.

"Be there" is the motto of the remote viewers!
 
Quote from Mav88:

I said Philosphy degrees are bullshit, I don't care where they are from. I also do not give two shits about your interest rate buttsex-whatever, that is not an experiment. I called your bullshit on the quantum brain and you won't supply scientific evidence. I asked you explain your 'out of time' bs, you won't. Obviously your self promoted interent forum degree is worthless, you can't think.

btw, Mountains and sand dunes on jupiter and you think he's spot on- what a dumbass!

Even in engineering you get a Doctorate of Philosophy.

The entire universe is quantum information pattern. All of time happens simultaneously. The past, the present, the future. That chart timeshifted forward 24 hours into the future (the dataset was generated Sunday evening).

Each datapoint was classified long/short.

Care to calculate the statistical probability of such a chart following the market so precisely on such a precise timeframe?? There are over 40 data points on that chart alone. Not all of them correct but it is a one in a million chart.


Science only moves forward at the rate of when those stuck in the past die off. Mav88, Please make your contribution to science today.
 
I can fit a chart to it too...from a long time ago. Not enough proof i say BS. Would you have fit any timebar, rangebar to fit it regardless is the question??? PLaying devils advocate. Prove me wrong.

Did you trade it?

ADD: Also anyone coming here saying "suck it" after matching a U shaped chart isn't very credible IMO.
 

Attachments

Good points I will address. Look back on page 7. I called out the following

the Asset: AUD/JPY
the timeframe: 30-40 minutes
the chart type: range or tick by tick, not time-based.
the exact start time: The Aussie Interest Rate Release at 10:30PM Eastern.

I don't know how I could have possibly been any more explicit about the parameters beforehand on page 7.

It wasn't a perfect chart as only 41 of 47 datapoints were correct.

Nevertheless we can calculate the probability of this happening.

The probability of exactly x successes (41) in n trials (47) is given by equation (2.20) in Reehl's "Mathematics of options trading.

Given the probability of a single data point going long or short is 50%, we find that the odds of this chart occurring randomly is roughly 1 in 13 million

I have attached a corrected chart. The bad data points are coded in red in the top and bottom. The upper chart is the original chart with errors and the lower chart is correcting the bad data points.

The probabilities are calculated directly in excel with

n = 47
x = 41
p = 0.5

P(x:n)=((fact(n))/(fact(x)*(fact(n-x)))*((p^x)*(1-p)^(n-x))

1 in 13,107,011
 

Attachments

Back
Top