

Quote from brocklanders:
I suggest your read a book called Journeys out of the Body by Robert A. Monroe. Monroe presents a very lucid and clearly documented account of what he experienced after he accidentally started having out of body experiences.
He spent over thirty plus years having Out of Body Experiences (OOBE) and while he did run across some nasty sorts "on the other side" he does not ever encounter demons or Satan (or God for that matter either). It is an excellent read. I am starting on his second book shortly.
Until you have been there you can only speculate, just like those who talk definitively about God and Christ and all of these do's and don'ts we have without knowing through any direct experience themselves.
Quote from kocmodpom:
Remote Viewing is as mind numbing as reading a Mav88 post. Never done OBEs before, only read a book about it once. Same one referenced by a previous poster on this thread. They are not even close to being the same thing.
The following is a PhD thesis on remote viewing published at the University of Texas-Austin. Sorry it is not a crackerjack box.
http://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/ETD-UT-2009-12-682/SMITH-DISSERTATION.pdf
Even in engineering you get a Doctorate of Philosophy.
Each datapoint was classified long/short.
Care to calculate the statistical probability of such a chart following the market so precisely on such a precise timeframe?? There are over 40 data points on that chart alone. Not all of them correct but it is a one in a million chart.
Science only moves forward at the rate of when those stuck in the past die off. Mav88, Please make your contribution to science today
The entire universe is quantum information pattern. All of time happens simultaneously. The past, the present, the future. That chart timeshifted forward 24 hours into the future (the dataset was generated Sunday evening).
I'm not saying remote viewing doesn't work. It does. What we're disputing here is causality. Because something happens, doesn't mean it happens for a scientific reason. After-the-fact explanations are always the least scientific because any plausible sounding theory can be made to fit the facts. The origin of the universe, the origin of life, remote viewing, are just a couple of junk-sciences "greatest hits". They have no idea. Nor will they ever know. They simply attach half-baked theories as to why this or that occurred, throw in a few mathematical formulas with a thousand conditional assumptions, and you call it "science". After all, there is no God. So everything "must" have a science-based explanation. How do you know God doesn't exist? How do you know God doesn't exist outside human awareness, which is a vast, uncharted sea of knowledge, humans have even yet to fathom?