Religion is a hypothesis.

Quote from killthesunshine:

Be thankful that you have a life, and forsake your vain and presumptuous desire for a second one.
– Richard Dawkins

HERE is the wisdom! :)


Now that is funny :D .
 
Quote from Index piker:

Now that is funny :D .

why? you, and i have hit the life/existence lottery. if just ONE other sperm cell out of 50 MILLION (less for you MEAT eaters :D )nuked your mommies egg, YOU wouldn't be here :D

someone else would, think about THAT :eek:
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

why? you, and i have hit the life/existence lottery. if just ONE other sperm cell out of 50 MILLION (less for you MEAT eaters :D )nuked your mommies egg, YOU wouldn't be here :D

someone else would, think about THAT :eek:


Don't be silly, of course I would still be here only my body's DNA would be slightly different.
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

uh, you are your DNA dude. diff DNA diff dude :D

You are being silly again.

1)If diff dna =different person:


2)Then same dna is same person.

Both are demonstrably false statements.

2) Clones and mono-zygotic twins are not the same person/animal.

1) Dna can and does change , they are not considered different people.

Nor are chimera seen as 2 different people.
 
Quote from Index piker:

You are being silly again.

1)If diff dna =different person:


2)Then same dna is same person.

Both are demonstrably false statements.

2) Clones and mono-zygotic twins are not the same person/animal.

1) Dna can and does change , they are not considered different people.

Nor are chimera seen as 2 different people.

let me run this by my genetics guy @berkley :)
 
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? – Epicurus

enuf said :cool:
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Oh, you mean the guy you have faith in...

...and the atheists say they don't practice faith...
no

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? – Epicurus

this about sums it, doesn't it?
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? – Epicurus

enuf said :cool:

Of course more celebrated bezerkly wisdom.

Too funny,assigning anthropocentric characteristics to God is certain to encounter absurd conclusions.

The fault lies not with God but your feeble attempts to fully pigeonhole infinity according to your (comparatively)infinitesimal perspective .

Hint: God will not be found questioning the staff at bezerkly nor acting like a spoiled child on the net.
 
Back
Top