So Ockam's Razor, that's what.Quote from Teleologist:
kut2k2 wrote:
"Thus far in any scientific theory of evolution, there is no need for the hypothesis of a Creator."
ID isn't a hypothesis of a Creator. ID is an investigation of possible teleology behind the origin of life and subsequent evolution. Sure, the data from the natural world can be interpreted from a non-teleologocal perspective. So what?
When two separate theories can completely explain some set of observations of interest, the simpler theory is always the correct one. In science the only reason to reject a simple theory for a more complicated one is because the simple theory can no longer explain new observations or test results.
ID is a more complicated explanation than a non-teleological explanation of evolution. Until it becomes necessary, ID is a matter of faith, not a matter of science.