Quote from Mike805:
Yeah, there is one that is fairly well known, but, its not necessarily based on anything emotional; the 10am PST reversal is one given some simple conditions. I suspect this one is due to traders getting trapped or something like that... I think Stocks and Commodities mag did a test on it 6 months or so ago and they probably explain it better. If you modify it slightly, its tradeable, but, you'll have some long DD's. News events and FOMC are usually good times too.
What I personally look for is anything that happens too fast. Stocks/Futures that rise to quickly or fall too quickly and I toss my coin at those points so to speak. My edge is about 52% across all my systems in real life and I average about 5k-7k trades a year - my most profitable system is at 40% hit rate with 4-1 payoff. Its done very well on the 30 year and the ES this year. Lately I've been moving towards lower hit rate systems as I find them more fun to trade; a homerun versus a law of large numbers kind of thing.
FYI, the system I posted can actually be modified to produce a decent edge (not good enough for my tastes, hence my posting it here), but, its a good starting point for a newb maybe. Always KISS...
IMO coin tossing at any price&time based extreme will be profitble... I don't feel the need to prove it, but, lets just say I do quite well with a 52% win rate
The daily occuring "settlement" is significant.
It is not a precise time since it is a cummulative activity of the full range of the financial industry.
Smart money trades all the time and smart money definitely takes into account the bias introduced by settlement conditions, circumstances and situations.
Most traders have to deal with how any day unfolds. Market pace and volatility play an important role in the ATS look up tables.
Three major facets of trading are always at play: market status; market signals and the combination and weights of sentiment on all the statistical significant market fractals.
Anyone reading frequent and skilled traders can recognize the consideration given to these facets when examples are provided. For example there is another thread running now on TA evaluation as presented in various research papers and paper reviews of TA. Some posted themes evolve around prediction and others have taken prediction out of the TA picture.
In this thread, the status of markets has not even appeared in the picture in terms of dialogue. One very important aspect of market operating points is how changing from one operating point to another is processed scientifically.
I doubt if many observers and/or analysts are able to consider shifts in operating points and what the trading ramifications are. To come to understand that the market does not jump around takes a lot of reasoning. To finally be able to conclude that all choices but the inevitable choice have been successively eliminated as time passes is rarely understood. You can easily determine if a poster is even in the ball park or if he is operating on the basis of insisting upon having a predicting orientation.
There is little chance that any thread on any topic can get very far when threads are mostly dominated by lack of any awareness of these three facets.