Racism is White America’s HIV

[dbphoenix]

Actually white Americas HIV is the white man trying to appease a group of mindless thugs.

What mindless thugs? Republicans?

 

[Hoofhearted]

Is this a joke?

Really? I haven't heard a single Republican ever blame anything they're pissed off at on Lincoln.

Really- I find your statement fascinating, and quite hard to believe.

But to be accurate, in my original statement I never said anyone has blamed Lincoln.

I referred to the so called "Liberal movement" that has happened since the time of the Lincoln Administration.

Has this not been the kitty which toughens the Republican's titty?

 

[dbphoenix]

Really- I find your statement fascinating, and quite hard to believe.

I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!

 

[Hoofhearted]

I haven't heard a single Republican ever blame anything they're pissed off at on Lincoln.

Perhaps you should remove the clamp from your nose and smell what has been laid down all over your lawn.

http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...ow-black-americans.240988/page-3#post-3504218

Like lincoln, Obama heads a party with no interest in compromise and every intent to push its radical program no matter what the consequences. Of course, with Lincoln those consequences included a Civil War with some 600,000 people killed, vast war crimes committed by the winning side and regional animosities that linger to this day.

http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...as-quest-to-undo-the-party-of-lincoln.233952/

Ron Paul’s quest to undo the party of Lincoln
By Michael Gerson, Published: January 1

Let us count the ways in which the nomination of Ron Paul would be groundbreaking for the GOP.

No other recent candidate hailing from the party of Lincoln has accused Abraham Lincoln of causing a “senseless” war and ruling with an “iron fist...

This is the reason Paul is among the most anti-Lincoln public officials since Jefferson Davis resigned from the United States Senate. According to Paul, Lincoln caused 600,000 Americans to die in order to “get rid of the original intent of the republic.” Likewise, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 diminished individual liberty because the “federal government has no legitimate authority to infringe on the rights of private property owners to use their property as they please.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...y-of-lincoln/2011/12/30/gIQAOrlyUP_story.html

Hell, why not just read AAA's comment at the beginning of this thread and then ask him, "Is Lincoln to blame for race-baiting, tyranny, and many other crimes against humanity even today?"

See what he says.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Hell, why not just read AAA's comment at the beginning of this thread and then ask him, "Is Lincoln to blame for race-baiting, tyranny, and many other crimes against humanity even today?"

See what he says.

Alright. AAA, are you blaming Lincoln for race-baiting, tyranny and many other crimes against humanity that are present today - and what other crimes would those be, if so? Or is it that Hoofhearted has misread your intent and is just doing some good old fashioned trolling and taking comments out of context - or interpreting your words into a narrative he wishes to discuss?

Could you please clarify, AAA?

 

[fhl]

Don't mind Hoof. He's probably unaware that Lincoln stated categorically that starting a war with the south had absolutely nothing to do with freeing the slaves and absolutely everything with forcing the south to collect import taxes. Just like he wasn't aware that MLK didn't even use his real name.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Really- I find your statement fascinating, and quite hard to believe.

But to be accurate, in my original statement I never said anyone has blamed Lincoln.

I referred to the so called "Liberal movement" that has happened since the time of the Lincoln Administration.

Has this not been the kitty which toughens the Republican's titty?

Sorry, I just saw that you replied to the same comment in two different replies (no idea why, but whatever). Did you want me to ignore this one in response to your later one? Or shall I address the kitty/titty comment?

 

[Hoofhearted]

Sorry, I just saw that you replied to the same comment in two different replies (no idea why, but whatever). Did you want me to ignore this one in response to your later one? Or shall I address the kitty/titty comment?

Go right ahead, I'm listening.

 

[Tsing Tao]

I referred to the so called "Liberal movement" that has happened since the time of the Lincoln Administration.

Has this not been the kitty which toughens the Republican's titty?

I don't believe it has, no. I don't believe Republicans have claimed themselves "victims" of the liberal movement. I'm sure there are some exceptions to that, but Republicans follow a philosophy that doesn't fit very well with "victim hood". Oh, sure, they'll complain about what they see as wrong, or things they believe should be changed, but you just don't normally see folks on the right referring to themselves as victims of something - to do so implies they are not empowered to fight back in some way.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Alright. AAA, are you blaming Lincoln for race-baiting, tyranny and many other crimes against humanity that are present today - and what other crimes would those be, if so? Or is it that Hoofhearted has misread your intent and is just doing some good old fashioned trolling and taking comments out of context - or interpreting your words into a narrative he wishes to discuss?

Could you please clarify, AAA?

I'm sorry, but I don't know what you're referring to. When did I mention Lincoln?