Race, IQ and predisposition towards violence and irrationality

FortuneTeller said:
Yes, blame the white man for the black man's inferior intelligence. Like we whitey's created their brains like we are gods of creation. But what about the blacks in Africa? How intelligent are they? Are they more intelligent than the blacks in America? I would like to see the research you have found on this subject. And where does it say that a bigger stronger black man is dumber than a smaller weaker one? That's like saying big tall strong white people are dumber than shorter weaker white people.
More...

Per usual, FC makes it up on the fly and then screams obscenities at anyone who disagrees with him.
 
If it is indeed the case that blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites, we need to reserve more jobs for blacks in companies which do not require that much intellectual input e.g. more jobs at McDee and KFC should be reserved for our less intelligent black citizens.

This will free up more jobs for whites, Asians etc at investment banks, law firms etc.
 
I am not black... but I have had friends and clients who are.

I have lived in nice neighborhoods or beach neighborhoods just about my whole life.
The vast majority of black people I have met have been smart successful black people. Typically they also had successful dads or someone who drove them to be academically or athletically ambitious... similar to my other neighbors. Additionally my most interesting professor and the one who took the most time to talk to me about my future is a black man.

The first guy I worked for out of school was a smart black guy.
To me is much more about inner city politics than genetics.

I think we need workfare instead of welfare and polices which encourage stable 2 parent families.

I think about the amount of lives destroyed by the democrats and their great society give away.

I get annoyed that democrats/leftists like fc don't see what they are voting for and instead try to blame slave breeders. Black families and to a large degree black success in the big cities have been destroyed by democrats... not slave breeders.
 
jem said:
I am not black... but I have had friends and clients who are.

I have lived in nice neighborhoods or beach neighborhoods just about my whole life.
The vast majority of black people I have met have been smart successful black people. Typically they also had successful dads or someone who drove them to be academically or athletically ambitious... similar to my other neighbors. Additionally my most interesting professor and the one who took the most time to talk to me about my future is a black man.

The first guy I worked for out of school was a smart black guy.
To me is much more about inner city politics than genetics.

I think we need workfare instead of welfare and polices which encourage stable 2 parent families.

I think about the amount of lives destroyed by the democrats and their great society give away.

I get annoyed that democrats/leftists like fc don't see what they are voting for and instead try to blame slave breeders. Black families and to a large degree black success in the big cities have been destroyed by democrats... not slave breeders.
More...

I find myself in the awkward position of having to agree with you and FC. As FC stated, the breeding played a role. How significant that role was is relative to the time. 150 years ago FC was more right than not. Fast forward to today, you are more right. Inner city politics has played a huge role in the destruction of the black family, their social values, and their communities.
Trying to determine what went wrong here is complicated and there are few clean hands. What we know for sure is that, for what now has spanned multiple generations, the black communities are in a state of total chaos. Not only are things not getting better, they're getting worse. The family structure for the inner city black child is all but gone. The public education system is a disgrace. Like the African slave sellers of times gone by, black leadership has abandoned their people for little more than a quick buck. Guilt ridden white leftists do more harm than good with their constant hand wringing and apologies. Hard hearted white people on the right don't offer much either with over simplifications of the problem and supposed solutions. In short, it's a f'n mess. Solutions will be neither simple or painless and until we can accept these truths there will be no progress. Hell, we can't even get started.
 
I am not really arguing with you captain... I think this is just more of my theory vs yours... but...


I have trouble believing big equals dumb or that slavers were selecting for dumb. Any time spent in the south or midwest and you quickly look around and see the successful farmers are generally smart and full of common sense. its easy to think of a big dumb farmer shoveling hay... but how many of those guys keep their farms or stay employed?

Would a plantation really stay successful by whipping a bunch of big dumb slaves into obedience? I guess the question is - what do the staple crops of that time require for a workforce. Could it be mostly big and dumb? I don't really know.

I would have no troubling believing successful middle aged and older plantation owners were looking to buy good looking young female slaves. Imagine a stable of young women you selected a half mile down your plantation's dirt road. If you already took the step of owning slaves... (which is a difficult step to imagine... its not big step to think it also led to sexual slavery) I therefore have no trouble believing many blacks in America have slave owners in their family tree. I have zero trouble believing that middle age plantation owner's black offspring became the house people or the black people who were sent up north to be free.

I just don't see this jimmy greek big athlete idea being a large component of the picture. But, I realize this is all terrible speculation so I could be wrong.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top