Going with a long time frame mitigates the HFT disadvantage, ltw.
I really want to see if this guy simply isn't regurgitating readings from the Amazon best seller list. He does sound like a regurgitator. With a tone of condescension to mask his pay grade.
Condescending? That's the pot calling the kettle black my friend. Many of the most successful trend followers in the world use very low frequency trading. The fact that you do not know this is telling. This type of trading was around long before guys like Covel jumped on the bandwagon. I don't care for his books. They lack useful detail.
Just out of curiosity...why are you even in the option trading threads?
Do you realize that these top trend followers average a win rate of 30%-40%% and drawdowns averaging 30% as well. Do you know the inverse relationship between win rate and potential drawdowns?
Your quoting Covel who was quoting Keith Campbell......
#facepalm
Regurgitation at it's finest. I'm out.
I don't agree. Some of the top hedge fund managers in the world frequently trade 120% of their accounts in futures, but would never dare to do such a thing with options. That tells you something. Can you lay on too much leverage with futures? Sure. But options are inherently dangerous even if you do not borrow any money to buy them.
Fully automated trend following is one example.
I notice you didn't bother to 'correct' me when I said you have blown out your account to absolute zero gambling with options. Which means you obviously have. 'Positive expectancy' is a silly term options traders use to convince themselves they are not gambling.