Question regarding selling puts for premium

Going with a long time frame mitigates the HFT disadvantage, ltw.

I really want to see if this guy simply isn't regurgitating readings from the Amazon best seller list. He does sound like a regurgitator. With a tone of condescension to mask his pay grade.
 
Going with a long time frame mitigates the HFT disadvantage, ltw.

I really want to see if this guy simply isn't regurgitating readings from the Amazon best seller list. He does sound like a regurgitator. With a tone of condescension to mask his pay grade.

Condescending? That's the pot calling the kettle black my friend. Many of the most successful trend followers in the world use very low frequency trading. The fact that you do not know this is telling. This type of trading was around long before guys like Covel jumped on the bandwagon. I don't care for his books. They lack useful detail.
 
Condescending? That's the pot calling the kettle black my friend. Many of the most successful trend followers in the world use very low frequency trading. The fact that you do not know this is telling. This type of trading was around long before guys like Covel jumped on the bandwagon. I don't care for his books. They lack useful detail.


And your telling me that the insurance companies with hundreds of billions AUM are mistaken in offering guaranteed return, equity-linked insurance products using very similar derivatives.

While the top 3 Trend followers who can't be more than 20 billion AUM, encompassing greater than 50% of Total assets managed are actually trading a more reliable strategy.

Do you realize that these top trend followers average a win rate of 30%-40%% and drawdowns averaging 30% as well. Do you know the inverse relationship between win rate and potential drawdowns?
 
Do you realize that these top trend followers average a win rate of 30%-40%% and drawdowns averaging 30% as well. Do you know the inverse relationship between win rate and potential drawdowns?

Ah, yes, the "only 30%" comment. I knew that was coming. That is a relatively safe 30% with TEMPORARY draw downs. These men are entrusted with BILLIONS of dollars because they can "only" average 20%+ in client accounts.
 
Your quoting Covel who was quoting Keith Campbell......

#facepalm

Regurgitation at it's finest. I'm out.

The first Hedge Funds Market Wizards book 'Market Wizards' spoke of these things two decades before Covel jumped on the bandwagon. You shouldn't get so personal with people who don't agree with you. Emotions have no place in trading.
 
I don't agree. Some of the top hedge fund managers in the world frequently trade 120% of their accounts in futures, but would never dare to do such a thing with options. That tells you something. Can you lay on too much leverage with futures? Sure. But options are inherently dangerous even if you do not borrow any money to buy them.

They're not more inherently dangerous than any other leveraged/margined instrument when used reasonably. Just because you lack self control doesn't mean the rest of the universe does.

I don't think you understand options entirely. There's more to options than simply punting around steamroller OTM naked puts or credit spreads.

Fully automated trend following is one example.

Haha Jesus. In the words of the great McEnroe: You *cannot* be serious?!
 
I notice you didn't bother to 'correct' me when I said you have blown out your account to absolute zero gambling with options. Which means you obviously have. 'Positive expectancy' is a silly term options traders use to convince themselves they are not gambling.

That is because during the beginning of my trading journey, over 20 years ago, I blew accounts, yes plural, and it was not because of options, was because of inexperience just like your comments, pure inexperience.
 
Back
Top