Could we have one thread without endless "show me your pnl and account details" and "unpossible as dictated by [insert meme here]" discussions? I think most here should be mature enough to quit their BS and at least try to give a benefit of doubt, as in what's the possible harm and you might expand your perspectives or thought-processes, even if the information is inaccurate or wrong in some way? Otherwise, any sharing is pointless, as arguments can be construed against *anything*.
Regarding edge: If there is edge, there can be anti-edge. If your perspective says edge is skill, call it anti-skill, but you can't have one end of a spectrum without the other. I have proof that anti-edge is real, especially in light of how much brokers charge for retail trading, but also in my own incompetence in aligning myself with the markets over so many years or even understanding the game at all. Something obviously very simple for the rest of ET.
Regarding "100% per week returns": That's one metric, one perspective of the markets. I fully respect avoiding any rat-race to become billionaire, betting farm x 100 and the like, which some actually do. However, such rates are very quickly misinterpreted by others. What I do feel though, is that there's a secret to this, and maybe also a lesson in humility and choosing the middle path, for real success, a smile, not too much $$$ prospects to handle.
Maybe my belief that honesty is most important in trading (for yourself and in harmony with the world) should be replaced by humility? I try to learn.
Both Ms: Thanks for real efforts to share perspectives and attitudes. Superficial criticisms should be ignored. Only our self can be the final judge.
