txuk, for me the possibility of overlap came more into view than a resumption so I was more tuned to that during monitoring. the lateral (5m pennant) turned out to be the 2nd price rotation of the next 5m trend (which was inside the overlap of the prior trend) so not anticipating this possibility while monitoring puts us two or more profit takings behind the beat, not to mention, being hesitant reversing on the BO. (Consider that 45 mins prior to the BO, smart money was ready to go long). Seeing the new RTL of the next trend sitting there for 2 price rotations (RTL+LTR) would've had you reversing without the hesitation I'm sure. The BO started what turned out to be another 2 more price rotations off the new RTL (4 profit takings) and seeing the vol on the BO is nothing but reassuring and pure mental healthiness for what we're trying to learn and accomplish here. We're trying to partner with the market and this was the market partnering back with you and rewarding you for being THERE. In summary, I think your debrief is right on. Sidelining would've provided the mental/financial protection you needed at the time. What this post is, is just another set of considerations from a fellow peer who has NOT got it all together yet but just happened to be THERE at the time in question.
my attachments:
I'm a little handicapped on the 5m chart. I use the 15s YM and 30s ES charts for PRV and at some point started annotating the 5m traverses on them. I'm not very good at observing bar ends on a 5m so I compensate by doing so on the smaller fractal but I calibrate their activity with the 5m to prevent hyperness..I think it works well for now until I get better on the 5m. Attached you find my stuff for Friday. A set of illegal hershey charts and my trades for the day (wash practice and test trades), or at least what I can trade in between conference calls, meetings with vendors, system upgrades, etc. Welcome any critiques or other sharings.