Quote from Chicken Little:
Do you not recommend this for just me or do you not recommend this for all ? If this no longer works why did it stop ? Did it ever work ? Why was it recommended then but not now ?
I recommend it for the kinds of people I noted in the copy you posted. Look at that paragraph and see, in detail, to whom I recommended it.
There you see you are not found. You are not part of that group as you have told us by you posts and by your actions and by your attitude. So you are not a person who is in the group to which my stuff applies.
As a general example that applies to mostly anything, mostly anything does not apply to all. You think that it is possible for something to apply to all. You have a very rarely found view point. Please expect that when you use this viewpoint to ask a question, that you are going to get a very standard answer that will tell you, yet one more time, that it is rare that anything would apply to all. This is a matter of thinking. Thinking is not on your resume as you can see by this new series of questions. There is a gerry who is like you a lot.
If this no longer works why did it stop ? This is a very neat question. It may be possible that you thought it up having never seen it anywhere before in any place on earth. This is a shorthand question that means to ask a couple of things and by knowing each of these facets you get to determine what you may or may not do. Systems fall into a couple of categories just as edges do. There is a universal test of quality that is nice to pass. It fits into "some things never change". Addition is a great example. addition does not come and go as something that works or not. You can place check marks next to each substantive aspect of the copy you posted to see if it is still around as would be the sum of three plus four equalling seven plus or minus one or better. So what I promulgate has passed the test of time as measured by "some things never change". The things that do change over time are not too good to use, especially if you do not know when they work and when they don't.
About it stopping in the past, I hadn't heard that it did. I would check your source and and not use the source anymore.
Did it ever work? Yes, it is a neat way to make 75,000 dollars a year nominally by working 30 minutes a day. This was offered, as you know from your research, perhaps, as an antidote to a particular service offered by another person.
Why was it recommended then but not now ? I was there then so I recommended it then. It is not recommended now because no one is recommending it. That discussion may have ended within the last five years. Hypothetically, consider what would happen if the discussion were resumed. If it were resumed, it could be recommended or not recommended. If "some things never change" were used as a criteria, it would pass that criteria. Since it would pass that criteria, then it could be safely recommended to the people who showed up to resume the discussion.
You must have difficulty reading books, wondering all the while if the subject is likely to have any use anymore.
The main point of "30 minute trading" is that a person who doesn't like to work or doesn't like to spend time doing anything, could just work 30 minutes a day with one contract to make 75,000 a year. These are two tough qualifications for the average Joe to meet. I don't envision you qualifiing; the distractions would be too much. Look at what happens between the beginning of any of your questions and by the time you get to the end of typing the question.
As my 83 yo now departed father-in-law once said on the rolling deck of our cruise ship at the sign up sheet for a second ping pong chamionship: "Boy, I just got here in time for the last slot; it was right near the top of the page just under the guy who wanted to do another championship round". So the champ beat him in the first match of the second round.
This stuff simply isn't for you play somewhere else, please.
). For the esig users, there's a bidaskvolume.efs you can add to your charts to observe the switch. IMO, if using this indicator, seeing the switch is easier on smaller fractals, but beware as it can make you hyperactive. Very interesting to watch, even rythmic when observing along with the sweeps.