You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Question for Grob/Hershey...
- Thread starter makosgu
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
These questions came up recently.
Wonder why he doesn't respond?
Would someone be so kind to post time and price for entries and exits on ES for sept 6th?
These Q's are from people who do not contribute. There is a quid pro quo on the table for getting this stuff understood.
Apparently they are missing it.
Here is a conceivable way to handle it.
Others here contribute a lot more than I do by the very fact of their operating here being helpful and showing self improvement. They also have a dream team going on for cross fertilization.
Some others post as well to warm others of their personal experiences in relating to this effort and prior efforts.
Recently, the US had a dissaster of large proportions. So I asked that those who were sharing profits locally with their communities 501 (c) (3)'s and NGO's in other parts of the world, if they would contribute to the H for H national office clearing house instead.
And since I was benefitting by having a lot of textual and examples given to me for the 10 SCT streams and 6 SCT appendices. One appendix is a set of how people fail as a completement to chapter 20 of HTMMIS where there are 18 failure modes.
With reference to the above quiries, these are two example of people who do not "get it".
My view is that I have posted prints of many trading days.
If I got a US post office cards showing a return receipt requests of contributions to H for H that corresponded to the same number of requests made of me to show trading and if I received a scan for each check in cluded in those mailings showing an amount equal to or not less than a better print posted by the complainer on his performances or separate different prints I posted , then there would be some negotiating about what contributions would be coming up next.
In other words the check size starts at my worst posted print and go up in increments determined by the next other prints that are found for my past posted prints.
All of this would apply in advance to each and eveeryone that would be showing up in the room who is on the B list.
Right now we are sitting at 4 for the first poster above and 10 for the second poster. You know who you are. Obviously a lot of B people have a lot of chacks to write to even get in the room.
The minimum number of participants will be 10 B people.
I know this is an easy deal. Just do the number of days of trading and make the profits in one day equal or better than 4 to 10 of my prints starting with the lowest one you can find.
Post ALL of the coordination of this in some other place of the B people's choosing. One more post here and the deal is off.
The deal is simply put your profits to work to help someone else to have that experience. They are just daily profits that show you do better than what I have posted. Take all the time you want. The H for H problem solving is going to be going on for a long time.
If you are a B person, don'task for anything here until you have qualified.
Wonder why he doesn't respond?
Would someone be so kind to post time and price for entries and exits on ES for sept 6th?
These Q's are from people who do not contribute. There is a quid pro quo on the table for getting this stuff understood.
Apparently they are missing it.
Here is a conceivable way to handle it.
Others here contribute a lot more than I do by the very fact of their operating here being helpful and showing self improvement. They also have a dream team going on for cross fertilization.
Some others post as well to warm others of their personal experiences in relating to this effort and prior efforts.
Recently, the US had a dissaster of large proportions. So I asked that those who were sharing profits locally with their communities 501 (c) (3)'s and NGO's in other parts of the world, if they would contribute to the H for H national office clearing house instead.
And since I was benefitting by having a lot of textual and examples given to me for the 10 SCT streams and 6 SCT appendices. One appendix is a set of how people fail as a completement to chapter 20 of HTMMIS where there are 18 failure modes.
With reference to the above quiries, these are two example of people who do not "get it".
My view is that I have posted prints of many trading days.
If I got a US post office cards showing a return receipt requests of contributions to H for H that corresponded to the same number of requests made of me to show trading and if I received a scan for each check in cluded in those mailings showing an amount equal to or not less than a better print posted by the complainer on his performances or separate different prints I posted , then there would be some negotiating about what contributions would be coming up next.
In other words the check size starts at my worst posted print and go up in increments determined by the next other prints that are found for my past posted prints.
All of this would apply in advance to each and eveeryone that would be showing up in the room who is on the B list.
Right now we are sitting at 4 for the first poster above and 10 for the second poster. You know who you are. Obviously a lot of B people have a lot of chacks to write to even get in the room.
The minimum number of participants will be 10 B people.
I know this is an easy deal. Just do the number of days of trading and make the profits in one day equal or better than 4 to 10 of my prints starting with the lowest one you can find.
Post ALL of the coordination of this in some other place of the B people's choosing. One more post here and the deal is off.
The deal is simply put your profits to work to help someone else to have that experience. They are just daily profits that show you do better than what I have posted. Take all the time you want. The H for H problem solving is going to be going on for a long time.
If you are a B person, don'task for anything here until you have qualified.
Quote from BA_Trader:
All that mess at the beginning of the PM was a FBO of the ST short channel which started up in the AM.
CC=>BO=>FBO=>5M TAPE=>5M TAPE=>5M TAPE=>5M CHANNEL
Congestion wasn't noticeable for me. Just Convergence and Centering.
TAPE (ie. narrow volatility)
Had to navigate on YM and zoom out to stay loose. There are also longer term Fractal boundaries coming into focus. You mention ST/IT bounds which evidently I need to consider rather than just be aware of. I scope and bound 5M, 30M, D, W, M, Q... I run all these sets on the SPX to avoid roll over issues and just periodically alt+tab the longer fractals front to back.
Kindest Regards,
MAK!
Attachments
We've been riding along a top of R for a couple of days - which you could consider the ST channel.Quote from makosgu:
CC=>BO=>FBO=>5M TAPE=>5M TAPE=>5M TAPE=>5M CHANNEL
Congestion wasn't noticeable for me. Just Convergence and Centering.
TAPE (ie. narrow volatility)
Had to navigate on YM and zoom out to stay loose. There are also longer term Fractal boundaries coming into focus. Would you be so kind as to inform as to where the ST fractals are. I scope and bound 5M, 30M, D, W, M, Q... I run all these sets on the SPX to avoid roll over issues and just periodically alt+tab the longer fractals front to back.
Kindest Regards,
MAK!
The short I advised earlier was at the RH side of a R-L of this channel along R. Those tapes were (from this perspective) big amplitude odd harmonics along the RH side... if I was more skilled I could have really raked it in.
The last tape was a R-L traverse that FTT'd - that's when I suggested covering the short.
Generally I stay pretty loose about what I consider ST - I let the market organize itself and I use the different terms in a relative way.
Quote from BA_Trader:
We've been riding along a top of R for a couple of days - which you could consider the ST channel.
The short I advised earlier was at the RH side of a R-L of this channel along R. Those tapes were (from this perspective) big amplitude odd harmonics along the RH side... if I was more skilled I could have really raked it in.
The last tape was a R-L traverse that FTT'd - that's when I suggested covering the short.
Generally I stay pretty loose about what I consider ST - I let the market organize itself and I use the different terms in a relative way.
Thanks BA,
Greatly appreciated. I stay loose also. Perhaps too loose but only as a means to not get hyper by scrutinizing every tick. Basically, if it's time for a #2 (& read a paper), there's 5 mins to make it happen and no need to worry, although, admittedly, I'll wait for a bar with increasing PRV volume at the beginning of a traverse.
Kind Regards
MAK!
- Status
- Not open for further replies.