A provocative article on Hedge Funds in the current edition of Forbes - it's the cover story. Your thoughts, please.
http://www.forbes.com/business/forbes/2004/0524/110.html
http://www.forbes.com/business/forbes/2004/0524/110.html

Quote from harrytrader:
I don't agree : Berstein belongs since very long to Wall Street Establishment and at each crisis touching fund managers performance - since it is nothing new - he is very good opportunist to make people think that he has a solution to lower risk and inccrease perf for example with a fund that would manage risk and perf according to the new Black & Scholes "super formula". So Wall Street make them the "new era" of no-risk whereas risk just come the fact that it is a zero sum game. So not only this would not change anything in fact with the multiplication of hedge funds that has now become a NEW FASHION propagated by WALL STREET themselves - why didn't you hear such idea before huh if it was so evident ? - my best guess that they will cause the Next Big Major Crash in Stock Market as the more leveraged the market is the more systematic risk there is.
They pretend to democratise Hedge Funds, this makes me laugh: since when Wall Street Managers want to make people win money : it just eat their cake haha ! So it's rather a new way to get the money earned by the middle of the pyramid now that the base of the pyramid has been washed out by the previous bubble, that is to say the so called "rich" risk this time to be really touched when the risk will materialise. And it will because that's how money is extracted and benefits materialise in the pocket of the Wall Street organisers. This industry is an organised syndicate of Crookery and you will make me believe that all of a sudden they decided to become all Saints, what's the probability that their nature has changed tell me![]()
That's my opinion and summarised before by
The next great hecatomb: the hedge funds
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=30656&highlight=Hecatomb
What were their ET screen names?Quote from harrytrader:
Two youngsters and a 53-year-old assistant literature professor at a small college in New York formed a hedge fund, JB Stanley, and lost most of the $400,000 they raised from 15 investors. They siphoned off the rest for car payments, ATM cash withdrawals and other personal uses, according to SEC claims that led to a summary judgment against the three managers.
Quote from Steve789:
I thought Harrytrader left! Can't stay away with your crackpot theories Harry? Who cares about a couple of lunatics, (were they French Harry), who conned some people out of their money? People lose money everyday because of poor choices. So ALL hedge funds are bad then?
Quote from Steve789:
I thought Harrytrader left! Can't stay away with your crackpot theories Harry? Who cares about a couple of lunatics, (were they French Harry), who conned some people out of their money? People lose money everyday because of poor choices. So ALL hedge funds are bad then?

Quote from manz66:
You just join ET, why are you hounding Harry?![]()