Sandmann case was entirely different... the claim was media reported one side.of the story incorrectly making Sandman look like the aggressor and the one who did everything.
Ritti...media can give their thoughts on a case with experts or commentary...called.freedom.of the press.
He will have his own lawsuits against him to deal with too, because, well, this is America.
Standards and threshholds of proof less in a civil case, difference in evidence rules, etc. etc.
One could argue that he has no assets so that will keep the wolves off his arse because "why bother." But that is an area where all this talk in forums and the media about his "Sandmanning" the media works against him. They want to get in line to sue him thinking if Rittenhouse is going to end out with a kabillion like Sandman then even if their claim is worthless he will settle out for some piddling amount that is still sweet.
Mind you, as you know, I said nothing about whether his claims against the media or "victims" claims against him have any legal merit. That feeding frenzy will pick up speed regardless because, again, this is America, and it is what we do.