Printing $....simple answer please.

scriabinop23 and aradiel it seems have identified and explained the important points.

But to reiterate the essential point aradiel brought up, economically speaking it is GOODS and SERVICES that equates to wealth. Money is merely a means to that end. It is what greases the wheel of productivity. In that light people should realize why the credit crunch is serious. It is not the loss of paper or electronic money that is of primary concern. The problem is that people and assets that create goods and services will be unemployed and idled. That is the problem.

In the big picture if printing money, which is basically theoretical in value, could lead to sustainable full employment and the production of goods and services with real value that would be good. That is why there is such an emphasis in economics for the pursuit of the idea of full employment with increasing productivity.
 
Quote from scriabinop23:

How is the Federal Reserve funded?
The Federal Reserve's income is derived primarily from the interest on U.S. government securities that it has acquired through open market operations. Other sources of income are the interest on foreign currency investments held by the System; fees received for services provided to depository institutions, such as check clearing, funds transfers, and automated clearinghouse operations; and interest on loans to depository institutions (the rate on which is the so-called discount rate). After paying its expenses, the Federal Reserve turns the rest of its earnings over to the U.S. Treasury.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm


And what you are looking for:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section7.htm

Please provide a youtube, blogger , goldbug or wikipedia link. :D
 
Quote from AAA30:

Please provide a youtube, blogger , goldbug or wikipedia link. :D

And I love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy... but unfortunately this is not the stuff of great movies.

The 9/11 events a la Loose Change .. that is good stuff.

Any physicists here to disprove the thesis? It looks like a convincing piece of propaganda.. (a la Zeitgeist)
 
Back
Top