Printing $....simple answer please.

Quote from scriabinop23:

...the arbitrary ability of the Fed to create 0% interest perpetual notes (debt) out of thin air is what makes the Fed unique.

Virtually all money-issuing authorities have this capability. Hell, Chavez in Venezuela can do this.

What has made the Fed unique - at least until recently - is that it could do it without disrupting the general perceptions on the long term viability of the money - errr - 0% perpetual note. That is an extraordinarily powerful position to occupy...
 
Quote from Stosh:

So, I suppose the only restraint on the govt financing itself this way would be the complaints from savers and fixed income folks when inflation results.

That would be the case in a country like Japan, where such a huge chunk of the federal largesse is funded by the internal population. It also used to the be case in the US, before the debt load required enormous lending commitments from overseas.

With the current and going-forward borrowing needs, we're probably moving from a "bank of mom & dad" world to a "bank of Tony Soprano" world. What is helping right now is that so many other G8 countries are in deep trouble as well, so even if the US looks horrible, it still looks a heck of a lot better than the UK. Think relative wealth, rather than wealth in absolute dollars.

But someday, possibly soon, we're going to have G7 countries going into default, and if they handle the process well it may pose very significant problems for the US.
 
Quote from Stosh:

Are you saying that when the Fed prints money it is as if they had struck a gold mine in their back yard.....they are creating the money out of thin air. If so, that really pisses me off. Let's say a counterfeiter were printing billions of dollars and spreading it out among the poor or building roads with it.......would that be similar to what govt does? So, I suppose the only restraint on the govt financing itself this way would be the complaints from savers and fixed income folks when inflation results. Otherwise, they might as well just finance this way and forget about all the complexities of borrowing and taxing. I'm rambling, but would appreciate your comments since it does appear that you know whereof you speak. Thanks, Stosh

Well they can do this up to a point.. But remember -- the exchange rate and value of the currency is dictated by the action that occurs on the margin. At a certain point, this money moves around and the dollar loses its viability.

But yes, you basically got this right. Also realize the fed needs to print just to offset productivity increases and population increases, otherwise deflation will set in (discouraging investment and trend growth)... Thus this is where inflation targeting is justified from.
 
Quote from scriabinop23:

Well they can do this up to a point.. But remember -- the exchange rate and value of the currency is dictated by the action that occurs on the margin. At a certain point, this money moves around and the dollar loses its viability.

But yes, you basically got this right. Also realize the fed needs to print just to offset productivity increases and population increases, otherwise deflation will set in (discouraging investment and trend growth)... Thus this is where inflation targeting is justified from.

So, when they provide this service of printing to offset productivity and population increases they are still taking in wealth, just like my altruistic counterfeiter would be doing. And when you throw in the complexity of the flimsy fractional reserve banking system which also creates money, it doesn't inspire much confidence to me. I hope Timothy Geitner understands this stuff!! Seriously, I know he does, but I have my doubts as to the % of politicians that do. They just think money grows on trees. Stosh
 
Quote from Stosh:

So, when they provide this service of printing to offset productivity and population increases they are still taking in wealth, just like my altruistic counterfeiter would be doing. And when you throw in the complexity of the flimsy fractional reserve banking system which also creates money, it doesn't inspire much confidence to me. I hope Timothy Geitner understands this stuff!! Seriously, I know he does, but I have my doubts as to the % of politicians that do. They just think money grows on trees. Stosh

My understanding is that the FED turns the interest (minus operating cost) to treasury. It does not gain any wealth.
 
Quote from Stosh:

So, when they provide this service of printing to offset productivity and population increases they are still taking in wealth, just like my altruistic counterfeiter would be doing. And when you throw in the complexity of the flimsy fractional reserve banking system which also creates money, it doesn't inspire much confidence to me. I hope Timothy Geitner understands this stuff!! Seriously, I know he does, but I have my doubts as to the % of politicians that do. They just think money grows on trees. Stosh

Agreed concerning most politicians likely not understanding how banking and money works. It would be fascinating to see how congress would do on a little 'quiz' of material from this thread. Regardless, I'm happy that the 4th branch of government (Fed) has discretion over these matters, and that it generally is a meritocracy with the most phD's of any govt agency. We all know that is absolutely no guarantee for success, but I'd rather have an MIT phD running the money instead of the countless ignorant buffoons that can refer to their best work as 'Buy American.'
 
Quote from scriabinop23:

The level of ignorance here astonishes me.

Money supply is a seperate measure, and can be arbitrarily created or destroyed. The fed creates money by creating a currency liability and buying an asset (usually treasuries) on its balance sheet.

The fed could print 6T-7T right now and arbitrarily gift it to the US govt, effectively paying off the total national debt. That would of course be very inflationary...

Also... All profits the Fed makes off the banking system etc are then distributed to the US treasury. There is no fraud or scheme here. It is collectively the US govt balance sheet.

I recommend you spend some time on econbrowser.com ... you are massively confused and should immediately stop giving out your perception of 'knowledge'.
Shakes Head

http://www.endthefed.us
 
I took Eco 101 over 40 yrs ago. I remember studying and being tested about the fractional reserve system and how the banking system creates money.....but I don't remember ever studying or being taught that the Fed can just print money like a counterfeiter and acquire wealth. It was certainly never on the exam. I always thought that the gov't had to get their funds mainly from taxing, borrowing, and fees. This thread has been an eye opener for me. It sounds like something that should be unconstitutional (and probably is). God help us. Stosh
 
Quote from the1:

What puzzles me is why the government can issue a bond, which is nothing more than a promise to pay but it can't issue it's own currency, which, likewise, would be nothing more than a promise to pay. The US's debt is backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government and their power to levy taxes so why can't the US issue its own currency, which would also be backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government and its power to levy taxes?

They can, read the Constitution. They just don't. They let the Fed do it.

Japan is thinking about issuing a new form of money from their government, as well as keeping their central bank notes. Guess that's one way to inflate. I don't quite understand how it's much different than just letting the central bank create more, but I guess in someone's mind it's different.
 
Back
Top