Quote from sgsaxton:
I've looked into this a little bit over the weekend and after some thought I'd have to say it makes things a whole lot more predictable.
But I'd like to ask this; Why on earth would anyone trade reversals as opposed to retracements? I mean, really, comparitively speaking they just are not percentage plays. Unless its absolutely obvious, I just can't see the reasoning behind it.
Steve
Quote from cnms2:
We may have different definitions for these terms: I trade confirmed reversals (a new trend in the opposite direction of the old trend), but I don't trade retracements (a temporary pause in a trend).
Quote from sgsaxton:
When you say "confirmed" do you mean by a retracement of sorts? (i.e to a S/R level)
I think our definitions are the same, however my view on trading a reversal is that something in the price behavior would lead one to believe the trend is about to change. i.e divergence of some sort or a pattern like a 1-2-3 top/bottom. My experience with both techniques is more often that not, you land up with the short end of the stick.
The reason being, simply put, one is trying to pick a top or a bottom.
Quote from ProfLogic:
Confirmed - An oscillation of Price verifying, depending on strength, that a short or long term top or bottom has been reached in that particular Market.
You are so correct, Divergence and Pattern Recognition techniques are both "accidents waiting to happen" because of their inconsistency. You can't "Predict" a top or bottom but you can Confirm it by determining the strength of the oscillations that make them up.
Quote from sgsaxton:
Confirmation such as low volume?