I know that.
I know that.
You and what army?
Cause i i dont think the 12 assasins you know can pull it off.
I know that.
I know that.
You and what army?
Cause i i dont think the 12 assasins you know can pull it off.
This is one scenario if the current deadlock cannot be broken fairly.
Its not in the Constitution but neither were the elections in several states Constitutional, besides the fraud that leveraged on that un-Constitutionality.
In a more Contitutional solution the current Vice-president will refuse to accept the electors from as few as two, or as many as six states where there are still serious concerns about their legitimacy.
The Constitution has a solution in that case: requiring one elector from each state . We know how that will turn out.
So, now is the time to settle, on both sides, a compromise. Once the playing field is clear of unconstitutional election conditions, once an army of poll watchers has been trained, we can really see how popular Biden really is, without the cover of corona and his little mask.
The fraud is the whammy Trump has on cult suckers like you little man.
Biden won in the normal manner, Trump could have won but he killed hundreds of thousands of people and even then, for those who could not see it was him fanning a disaster, was unable to find it in himself to show human empathy, even pretend. Parscale was right about that, he fucked up with that.
Instead he triumphed about his strength vs the dead losers and millions came out to end his presidency.
That's not Biden fault, had a great candidate run Trump would have lost by tens of millions.
If the DNC machinery had given a decent candidate a chance to run, possibly Trump could have lost, but not for the flames you assert. Its the DNC fault for propping up another fraud, two elections in a row.
Your "analysis" serves the purpose of propping up the ongoing fraud since Nov 3 , normalizing a coup.
With such 'analysis" you should be happy to show how popular is whats-his-name next November.
If the DNC machinery had given a decent candidate a chance to run, possibly Trump could have lost, but not for the flames you assert. Its the DNC fault for propping up another fraud, two elections in a row.
Your "analysis" serves the purpose of propping up the ongoing fraud since Nov 3 , normalizing a coup.
With such 'analysis" you should be happy to show how popular is whats-his-name next November.
Would this be acceptable to you? Joe and trump do Rock Paper Scissors. If trump loses, they do best two out of three. If trump loses again, they do best three out of five.....
if the republicans had put up a decent candidate in 2016, they might have won the election in 2020. Instead they almost lost a majority in the senate (where its all but guaranteed they should have a majority)
If the DNC machinery had given a decent candidate a chance to run, possibly Trump could have lost, but not for the flames you assert. Its the DNC fault for propping up another fraud, two elections in a row.
Your "analysis" serves the purpose of propping up the ongoing fraud since Nov 3 , normalizing a coup.
With such 'analysis" you should be happy to show how popular is whats-his-name next November.