Yes but he is still talking about a run of 4 in a row then betting on the 5th, and I quote him here "the odds of my winning the bet jump to 50%"Quote from Wayne Gibbous:
If I may...
Steve is not proposing that each coin flip ("fair" coin) is not independent. He has already stated that. It's basic stats.
Steve's bet is on runs and the odds of completing runs after the series is started. If given better than fair odds of completing the run, he, or anyone, would take them in a second. That's called an edge.
Also, I believe Steve's viewpoint is from that of what I believe a professional gambler would do. Professional gamblers don't gamble - they put on bets ("risk" in market parlance) - that they know from experience, or math, will have an edge if repeated many times. If a pro gambler noticed something peculiar about a run of numbers, or blackjack wins, or craps passes, or whatever, they would investigate.
Yes, they know the odds and stats and house edge of every game, but when something isn't "right" they might just jump in, figuring the game is rigged. Casinos also investigate happenings that stretch the limits of probability. It costs them money, otherwise.
Well, that's my take. Good trading to all.
Well he already had 50% at the start of the streak... and he cant even calculate the odds for 2 50% chances in a row so he is a little hard to take seriously


