Possible Election Fraud in Progress

The FBI has it and don't forget that 10 is for the big guy. By what other means do you think the big guy could purchase a house like the one below. It was not saving up his paychecks from being a Senator.

joe-biden-s-former-home-1603233353.jpg


https://www.the-sun.com/news/1943149/hunter-biden-federal-investigation-taxes-joe-biden/

HUNTING FOR ANSWERS
Hunter Biden probed by FBI ‘over foreign cash and money laundering as cops ‘seize laptop’ with Ukraine & China emails’

HUNTER Biden is being probed by the FBI over alleged money laundering and his ties to China after cops seized his laptop, reports say.

A Deep state plot to defame the Biden's, it a hoax.

We can play the same game as you, thanks for the script.
 
Who Funds the Federalist? Finally, We Know
https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2020/12/09/who-funds-the-federalist-finally-we-know/

For years, the funding behind the right-wing, pro-Trump publication The Federalist has been a total mystery. Many Twitter users have asked the website’s leaders, repeatedly, “Who funds The Federalist?” only to be blocked by the likes of publisher Ben Domenech, co-founder Sean Davis, or senior editor Mollie Hemingway. (This author is blocked by all three.)

Last year, Hemingway characterized the question as “a kind of a veiled threat” and a “clear, coordinated attempt to silence The Federalist.

However, a few months earlier, The Federalist’s affiliated nonprofit, FDRLST Media Foundation, had been certified as a 501(c)(3) charity by the Internal Revenue Service, meaning that donors could begin making tax-deductible contributions to the foundation. If the donor was a nonprofit organization like a family foundation or trade association, its grants to the FDRLST Media Foundation would eventually be part of the public record. Hemingway is a director and “governor” of the foundation.

Last week, CMD obtained the 2019 tax records of two right-wing funders who donated to the FDRLST Media Foundation that year: GOP megadonor and shipping supply billionaire Richard Uihlein and DonorsTrust, a donor-advised fund manager that has been dubbed “the dark money ATM” of the conservative movement.

The Uihleins
The Federalist may have once had a “never Trump” image, but the conservative publication moved quickly rightward as President Donald Trump became president and took over the Republican Party. The outlet is now known for vigorously defending Trump, for its trolling and conspiracy-laden posts, and for attacking liberal media. Sometimes trafficking in racism, The Federalist had a “black crime” tag until someone exposed the tag on Twitter.

It’s unclear when Uihlein, the Illinois-based founder of shipping supply company Uline, began funding The Federalist, but it makes sense that his foundation, the Ed Uihlein Family Foundation, donated $400,000 to the FDRLST Media Foundation last year. Uihlein and his wife, Liz, are influential Trump donors and among the Republican Party’s biggest funders; Uihlein is the fifth-biggest donor to outside political spending groups of the 2020 federal elections, having doled out over $63 million to super PACs such as the pro-Trump American First Action, Club for Growth Action, the Senate Leadership Fund, and Restoration PAC, which he funded nearly exclusively.

The New York Times reported in August that, based on interviews, Richard Uihlein was a donor to The Federalist, but his foundation’s 2019 tax return is the first evidence of his financial support to be made public.

As The Federalist published story after story denying science and opposing mask wearing during the coronavirus pandemic—including one story allegedly written by an anonymous small-town mayor claiming that health officials order mask mandates for political, not scientific, reasons—Liz Uihlein minimized the virus, calling it “overhyped,” and endangered Uline workers by allegedly using lax safety practices and initially discouraging employees from working from home. Liz Uihlein, the president and CEO of Uline, got an exemption from Canada’s quarantine requirement to visit a Uline facility in the country, which she reached via private jet. The Uihleins would eventually contract COVID-19 in November.

The Uihleins have endorsed fringe candidates such as Roy Moore, the far-right Alabaman who ran for Senate in 2017 and was credibly accused of sexual misconduct with minors by multiple women. Liz Uihlein was a member of the 2016 Trump campaign’s economic council.

The Ed Uihlein Foundation gave to additional right-wing media outlets in 2019, including The Daily Caller News Foundation ($25,000), the Media Research Center ($275,000), and the Real Clear Foundation ($350,000), which has ties to The Federalist (see below). It also donated $400,000 to the Center for Security Policy, an anti-Muslim hate group. Its largest 2019 contribution, $3.2 million, went to the Foundation for Government Accountability, a State Policy Network member that advocated kicking people off of Medicaid this year during the pandemic. Since 2014, the Uihleins have given the Foundation for Government Accountability over $11 million.

The “Dark Money ATM” of the Conservative Movement
One of the political right’s biggest funding vehicles, DonorsTrust, gave $249,000 to the FDRLST Media Foundation in 2019. CMD was first to report on DonorsTrust’s 2019 tax records and on the group’s major donation to the white nationalist hate group VDARE, as well as a smaller amount to the New Century Foundation, the nonprofit behind the white nationalist publication American Renaissance.

DonorsTrust also gave $1,350,000 to the Real Clear Foundation and nearly $400,000 to the Media Research Center in 2019, part of $15 million in grants to conservative media operations that year.

DonorsTrust is a donor-advised fund sponsor, meaning that it manages individual charitable accounts of its wealthy clients, who have included GOP megadonors such the DeVos, Koch, and Mercer Families. These clients can donate appreciable assets into their accounts and score a double tax benefit: they get both a capital gains tax break and a charitable tax deduction. Clients then direct DonorsTrust to donate their money to the nonprofits of their choice, as long as the DonorsTrust board approves the proposed recipient. Donor-advised fund managers allow their clients to remain anonymous, as the manager legally owns and disperses the money.

DonorsTrust and its sister organization, Donors Capital Fund, distributed $165 million in grants in 2019, much of it going to right-wing think tanks, advocacy groups, litigation centers, media outlets, extremists, and climate deniers.

Past Clues
The Uihlein and DonorsTrust grants are the first known donations to The Federalist, but one financial tie was already public. Journalist Andrew Perez found that the George E. Coleman Jr. Foundation is an investor in FDRLST Media, LLC, the company behind The Federalist. In 2018, the Coleman Foundation had $148,000 invested in FDRLST Media. The foundation’s trustee, Daniel Oliver, is a former Reagan official who was once executive editor of the conservative National Review, which receives significant funding from DonorsTrust through its affiliated National Review Institute.

In advance of a 2019 Buzzfeed News article that cited the Coleman Foundation investment, Domenech, The Federalist’s publisher, refused to comment but tweeted that this impending revelation of public information amounted to “doxxing” an investor. “They will do this because they want to shut us down,” he claimed.

Federal tax records for the FDRLST Media Foundation are not yet public, but the Washington, D.C. secretary of state has public records of the foundation. David DesRosiers, the publisher of Real Clear Politics and the former executive vice president of the Uihlein-funded Manhattan Institute, is a director. Hemingway is both a director and a “governor.” Attorney Alan P. Dye is the third director.

It’s possible that more FDRLST Media Foundation donors will emerge as CMD obtains additional 2019 tax records from conservative foundations.

In September 2017, FDRLST Media filed an offering of debt securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission. At the time, $200,000 of the $750,000 offered had been sold. Listed as a director of FDRLST Media was John McIntyre, president and CEO of Real Clear Media. Someone named Jenn McIntyre was also listed as a director and an executive officer. The filing located FDRLST Media at the same Chicago address as Real Clear Politics, the main publication of Real Clear Media.

Real Clear has taken a “sharp right turn” in recent years, likely due to its increased funding from right-wing donors and its reaction to Trump’s takeover of the Republican party. A CMD report showed that at least 99 percent of the 2015 to 2018 revenue of the Real Clear Foundation, which funds the outlet’s investigative stories, came from right-wing funders, including DonorsTrust, Donors Capital Fund, the Uihlein Foundation, and two foundations of Charles Koch.

“As the administration lurched from one crisis after another,” wrote The New York Times’ Jeremy Peters last month, “Real Clear became one of the most prominent platforms for elevating unverified and reckless stories about the president’s political opponents, through a mix of its own content and articles from across conservative media.”

Would it be fair to say they are as bad, more or less, as media outlets with a bias towards the Left and that bloggers such as ourselves are pawns in another’s game?
 
Tell us again what you guys been doing for the last four years?

Start with the Steele Dossier, please.
By the way, there is another reason for The Electoral College than just giving smaller states a voice. ------The Electoral College was designed in part to prevent a crook or anti-American from being elected. ----With the news about The Biden Family corruption coming out, this would be a great time to see this aspect of The Electoral College used---.
 
Why not make hte Jewish holiday about you as well!


Trump: The Jewish people have endured a lot over the centuries but always overcame the most impossible situations. Miracles are possible maybe we'll see one in the near future. Yes, we're not giving up and we'll keep fighting to ensure 4 more years.
 
Tell us again what you guys been doing for the last four years?

Start with the Steele Dossier, please.

You mean the one Trump DOJ investigated? How many Trump officials were indicted and imprisoned because of it? Didn't the Senate Republcians confirm collusion? Where can I read the full Mueller report? Why is it being hidden?
 
By the way, there is another reason for The Electoral College than just giving smaller states a voice. ------The Electoral College was designed in part to prevent a crook or anti-American from being elected. ----With the news about The Biden Family corruption coming out, this would be a great time to see this aspect of The Electoral College used---.

I disagree. All US citizens must feel our elections are legitimate. If the EC were to somehow to be able install Trump as President, our Democracy and confidence in our elections would be over.

The process I would like to see is the US Supreme Court, assuming there is merit and standing of an appropriate Trump Campaign lawsuit, is to compel lower courts to provide appropriate relief. If the US Supreme Court finds a lower court(s) was grossly negligent or even criminal in their handling of Trump campaign cases, perhaps an expanded order might be appropriate. However, in no case should any remedy subvert voter determination of our leaders. Therefore, appropriate remedies might include disqualifying invalid or fraudulent ballots, or in the situation where there is compelling evidence of fraud but the status of ballots cannot be determined because of inherent defects related to fundamental ballot security or previously required fraud detection, a new election in the affected precinct might be authorized.

Whatever happens, we need massive election reform to insure public confidence in the integrity of our elections are maintained. There needs to be multiple, anti-fraud laws at each particular aspect of our election process. There also needs to be legislation concerning media and pollster efforts to influence election results through manipulation and false reporting. Media, technology, and polling companies should face massive fines and their operating licenses should be at risk, along with suspension or revocation of their employees in participating in manipulative media or in polls. Obviously term like “Manipulation” and “Influence” need to be extremely well defined. As far as suppressing “Free speech”, as we have seen in the media and technology companies, the only free speech thry allow is what conforms to political correctness and media narratives. Everthing else gets censored or the offending individual is subjected to shaming and intimidation tactics. Perhaps the US Supreme Court has the authority to compel states into complying with these needed reforms on elections on at least the Federal level.

Another point, on some level our legislature and courts are not obligated to “Fix stupidity” on the part of Republicans. Election fraud is not new, Republicans have long known of the vulnerability of our elections, and Republican’s have been in the political position to do something about it. It was not hard to anticipate how a coordinated attempt to commit election fraud would look like. Further, the resources to accomplish election integrity were not lacking, especially considering the campaigning value the election fraud issue represents.

While we are on this level, is it better for us to be represented by smart and very corrupt politicians who seem to believe the wisdom of a few elites is greater than the combined wisdom of the masses or the dumb, but less corrupt Republicans who believe in many aspects of person freedom and the combined wisdom of the masses?

As civilization becomes more technologically oriented, and notice I did not choose the words “As civilization progresses”, the relative difference in intelligence confers an ever greater evolutionary advantage and at an ever quicker pace. This means the achievement gap between the stupid, unmotivated, and unconnected will accelerate, leaving behind a large population of non contributors to our system. Should resources become scarce...
 
You mean the one Trump DOJ investigated? How many Trump officials were indicted and imprisoned because of it? Didn't the Senate Republcians confirm collusion? Where can I read the full Mueller report? Why is it being hidden?

Indicted and convicted for what? Falling into purjury traps because of prosecutors asked the same questions over and over again, but in a slightly different way, tripping up the defendent who was orginally brought in under defective FISA hearings?

As far as redactions are concerned, have you ever heard of information requiring secret clearance and not being under the purview of the public?
 
I disagree. All US citizens must feel our elections are legitimate. If the EC were to somehow to be able install Trump as President, our Democracy and confidence in our elections would be over.

The process I would like to see is the US Supreme Court, assuming there is merit and standing of an appropriate Trump Campaign lawsuit, is to compel lower courts to provide appropriate relief. If the US Supreme Court finds a lower court(s) was grossly negligent or even criminal in their handling of Trump campaign cases, perhaps an expanded order might be appropriate. However, in no case should any remedy subvert voter determination of our leaders. Therefore, appropriate remedies might include disqualifying invalid or fraudulent ballots, or in the situation where there is compelling evidence of fraud but the status of ballots cannot be determined because of inherent defects related to fundamental ballot security or previously required fraud detection, a new election in the affected precinct might be authorized.

Whatever happens, we need massive election reform to insure public confidence in the integrity of our elections are maintained. There needs to be multiple, anti-fraud laws at each particular aspect of our election process. There also needs to be legislation concerning media and pollster efforts to influence election results through manipulation and false reporting. Media, technology, and polling companies should face massive fines and their operating licenses should be at risk, along with suspension or revocation of their employees in participating in manipulative media or in polls. Obviously term like “Manipulation” and “Influence” need to be extremely well defined. As far as suppressing “Free speech”, as we have seen in the media and technology companies, the only free speech thry allow is what conforms to political correctness and media narratives. Everthing else gets censored or the offending individual is subjected to shaming and intimidation tactics. Perhaps the US Supreme Court has the authority to compel states into complying with these needed reforms on elections on at least the Federal level.

Another point, on some level our legislature and courts are not obligated to “Fix stupidity” on the part of Republicans. Election fraud is not new, Republicans have long known of the vulnerability of our elections, and Republican’s have been in the political position to do something about it. It was not hard to anticipate how a coordinated attempt to commit election fraud would look like. Further, the resources to accomplish election integrity were not lacking, especially considering the campaigning value the election fraud issue represents.

While we are on this level, is it better for us to be represented by smart and very corrupt politicians who seem to believe the wisdom of a few elites is greater than the combined wisdom of the masses or the dumb, but less corrupt Republicans who believe in many aspects of person freedom and the combined wisdom of the masses?

As civilization becomes more technologically oriented, and notice I did not choose the words “As civilization progresses”, the relative difference in intelligence confers an ever greater evolutionary advantage and at an ever quicker pace. This means the achievement gap between the stupid, unmotivated, and unconnected will accelerate, leaving behind a large population of non contributors to our system. Should resources become scarce...
I didn't say that I wanted the Electoral College to replace Biden with Trump because Biden was a crook. I said that I would like to see The EC replace Biden because he is a crook. That is one of the reasons for The EC>
 
Back
Top