Possible Election Fraud in Progress

Before ? How many centuries would you like to go back? I thought we were discussing the 2020 election, which officials from both parties have praised as an election from from any significant illicit activity. As, by the way, so have international observers.

It appears I accidentally quoted you. My post was in response to El OchoCinco’s post where he suggested that election fraud has not occured in previous US elections.
 
It sounds like the US Supreme Court acts upon legal principle and is not partisan, right?

Therefore, should the US Supreme Court rule in favor of the Trump Administration, you would be ok with that, right?

Yes it would be OK. But reality looks like this:
  • if the Supreme Court judges in favor of Trump it is correct.
  • If the Supreme Court judges in favor of Biden, the Supreme Court is acting illegally.
So before asking us that question, ask it to Trump. I know the answer already. We see it every day.
 
If only you could understand one thing, you could figure things out for yourself.

What you're missing is that Trump is a "sociopath". He has what psychiatrists would diagnose as a severe Anti-Social Personality Disorder (ASPD). Look it up, note the diagnostic criteria. Then compare those criteria to Trump's behavior.

You are not the only one who fails to realize that Trump has a very severe personality disorder that renders him dangerous. Even many who simply look at what he does and recognize it as lunacy don't realize the severity of his disorder.

Your post sounds like justification for removing Trump from office using nearly any means possible, including election fraud. Or as Kathy Griffen might suggest, any means possible.

Believe it or not, I have entertained this idea myself and have posted as such. It seems possible that key leaders of both parties decided that Trump needed to go. If so, it was probably hoped that Trump would lose the election outright. In case Trump didn’t lose, plans would have been well in advance of the election to effect the outcome if need be.

The signs of the above scenario are there: Multiple, significant irregularities in swing states, the initial media blackout of these irregularities, lack of widespread Republican outrage, 1-50 in court rulings, many dozens of corroborating witnesses, media threats against attorneys representing the Trump campaign, and media threats of legal repercussions of witnesses coming forward.

There are possibly two specific reasons that may seem to justify the “Soft removal” of President Trump from office by leaders of both parties. It would not be productive to go into these reasons at this time.

The key question is, “Is there ever a justification for authorities to overturn election results by violating election law and disenfranchising voters?”

If party leadership did conspire to “Condone” election fraud in order to remove Trump from office, is not our Democracy on a slippery slope? Where a handful of politicians and Intelligence agents effectively decide their choice for leadership is more valid than 74,000,000 or so voters?

In any case, massive election reforms are necessary in the United States, especially in regards to US Presidential Elections.

Do you agree?
 
Yes it would be OK. But reality looks like this:
  • if the Supreme Court judges in favor of Trump it is correct.
  • If the Supreme Court judges in favor of Biden, the Supreme Court is acting illegally.
So before asking us that question, ask it to Trump. I know the answer already. We see it every day.
That Trump didn't win is the best evidence that the election was rigged. :D
 
Your post sounds like justification for removing Trump from office using nearly any means possible,
It is indeed. The 25th Amendment should have been invoked. That became impossible when those in his cabinet who might have been inclined to remove him from office for being mentally unfit resigned or were fired. Trump replaced all those who left the cabinet, even those forced out because of unethical or corrupt acts, with incompetent sycophants.

And, no, I do not agree with your screwball conspiracy theory as there is zero evidence to support it.

Don't waste your time thinking the Supreme Court is going to step in and hand the election to Trump. The High Court has already made it clear that they don't want to be bothered this Trump-Giulianni screwball election nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Time for another daily roundup of sources indicating election fraud:

First up is an article that dicusses the GA Senate runoff, but I wanted to quote this part in particular:

“More than 40% of voters nationally don't believe the 2020 election was legitimate, according to a poll of 1,500 U.S. voters carried out Nov. 21-25 that was sponsored by The Economist and conducted by YouGov”.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/elections-georgia-presidential-newt-gingrich-jackie-gingrich-cushman


Speaking of Georgia, it appears evidence of misconduct is gaining momentum. From the opening paragraph of this article:

“Critical questions still remain unresolved this week regarding the alleged early dismissal of poll workers in Atlanta's State Farm Arena on Election Night, a dismissal which some parties claim was followed by continued ballot-counting even after most workers had been sent home for the night”.
https://justthenews.com/politics-po...ist-over-early-dismissal-poll-workers-alleged


Even more on Georgia. The first two paragraphs of the article are included below:

“A Big Tech-backed “fact” “checking” outfit claimed to debunk explosive evidence in support of Republicans’ claims of significant election problems at a Thursday Georgia Senate hearing. It didn’t. Not even close”.

“Newly discovered security footage from Georgia’s State Farm Arena showed dozens of ballot counters, media, and Republican observers leaving en masse at the same time from the ballot-counting area for Fulton County. After they left, a small remnant of about four workers began pulling trunks containing thousands of ballots from underneath a table with a long tablecloth and running them through machines”.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/0...unting-video-was-not-debunked-not-even-close/


Trump keeping up the fight. The opening paragraph:

“More than two dozen House Republicans are calling on President Trump to direct Attorney General William Barr to appoint a special counsel to investigate November's presidential election, according to a letter obtained by Fox News”.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-republicans-election-special-counsel-letter


More Trump. Opening paragraph of article:

“President Trump said his campaign "will be INTERVENING" in a Texas lawsuit against a handful of battleground states that went for President-elect Joe Biden”.

The president chimed in on the Texas suit on Twitter Wednesday morning, saying, "It is very strong, ALL CRITERIA MET," and added in a subsequent tweet, "We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!"

"There is massive evidence of widespread fraud in the four states (plus) mentioned in the Texas suit. Just look at all of the tapes and affidavits!" he added.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...lawsuit-against-battleground-states-biden-won


Next up is just a little big tech censorship. First two paragraphs are included below:

“YouTube said Wednesday it will begin removing any videos that falsely claim widespread voting fraud changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential race now that the deadline for states to resolve disputes over the results has passed”.

“It's a policy shift that could put the tech giant at odds with President Donald Trump and his GOP allies in the remaining days of his administration, but one that will be welcomed by Democrats who have called for more aggressive action”.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/09/youtube-videos-mass-fraud-election-results-443925


Just a little threat by a Democrat Representative. First paragraph included:

“Michigan Democratic State Rep. Cynthia Johnson threatened President Donald Trump’s supporters in a Facebook live video Tuesday, saying it is a warning message to those who support the president”.
https://dailycaller.com/2020/12/09/...p-threatens-trump-supporters-cynthia-johnson/


There are actually more election related articles that support the contention there is a coordinated attempt to steal the 2020 US Presidential Election from Donald J. Trump, but let me catch a breather before I post them.
 
It sounds like the US Supreme Court acts upon legal principle and is not partisan, right?

Therefore, should the US Supreme Court rule in favor of the Trump Administration, you would be ok with that, right?

Absolutely not. Conservative states are already showing they are willing to break faith with the constitution. If the Supreme Court ever decides the president then there will no longer be a country and it wouldn’t be long until we fell apart.

Conservatives often wrongly point to Bush v Gore but in that case Bush was already declared the winner of Florida. The Supreme Court did not change the outcome.
 
Absolutely not. Conservative states are already showing they are willing to break faith with the constitution. If the Supreme Court ever decides the president then there will no longer be a country and it wouldn’t be long until we fell apart.

Conservatives often wrongly point to Bush v Gore but in that case Bush was already declared the winner of Florida. The Supreme Court did not change the outcome.
The Supreme Court will not be deciding the president.
 
The 25th Amendment should have been invoked.
The 25th should clearly be invoked then for Biden. Biden is obviously suffering from some form of dementia and he meets all of the qualifications of someone with ASPD.
 
Back
Top