Your post sounds like justification for removing Trump from office using nearly any means possible, including election fraud. Or as Kathy Griffen might suggest, any means possible.
Believe it or not, I have entertained this idea myself and have posted as such. It seems possible that key leaders of both parties decided that Trump needed to go. If so, it was probably hoped that Trump would lose the election outright. In case Trump didn’t lose, plans would have been well in advance of the election to effect the outcome if need be.
The signs of the above scenario are there: Multiple, significant irregularities in swing states, the initial media blackout of these irregularities, lack of widespread Republican outrage, 1-50 in court rulings, many dozens of corroborating witnesses, media threats against attorneys representing the Trump campaign, and media threats of legal repercussions of witnesses coming forward.
There are possibly two specific reasons that may seem to justify the “Soft removal” of President Trump from office by leaders of both parties. It would not be productive to go into these reasons at this time.
The key question is, “Is there ever a justification for authorities to overturn election results by violating election law and disenfranchising voters?”
If party leadership did conspire to “Condone” election fraud in order to remove Trump from office, is not our Democracy on a slippery slope? Where a handful of politicians and Intelligence agents effectively decide their choice for leadership is more valid than 74,000,000 or so voters?
In any case, massive election reforms are necessary in the United States, especially in regards to US Presidential Elections.
Do you agree?