Possible Election Fraud in Progress

Giuliani, Trump Pull Off 'One Hell Of A Hearing' On Pennsylvania Election Fraud


Update (1747ET): With the hearing concluded, people are commenting on how credible and well spoken the witnesses were in describing election fraud in Pennsylvania.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...re-giuliani-hold-public-hearing-2020-election

upload_2020-11-25_17-58-53.png
 
Yes they like to “repost” conservative right wing articles but that doesn’t necessarily negate the veracity of the article.

This particular one has some twitter feeds from the hearing. The one most interesting was the witness who explained the loading of ballots and the spikes in reporting that took place. In this particular instance close to 600k ballots/votes were up loaded during a short period of time.

3200 for Trump.
570k+ for Biden

The courtroom erupted in gasps.
 
Yes they like to “repost” conservative right wing articles but that doesn’t necessarily negate the veracity of the article.

This particular one has some twitter feeds from the hearing. The one most interesting was the witness who explained the loading of ballots and the spikes in reporting that took place. In this particular instance close to 600k ballots/votes were up loaded during a short period of time.

3200 for Trump.
570k+ for Biden

The courtroom erupted in gasps.
So .... you're saying .... it's a slam dunk case for Trump et al.?
 
Trump calls into Pennsylvania hearing, rambles about voter fraud on speakerphone
"We have to turn the election over, because there's no doubt we have all the evidence," he said, providing no evidence.



A president conferene calling into a hearing begging to overturn his loss..... sad..
 
I trust my numbed and what the judges are told arers for reasons as stated in post one of this thread. However, if the testimony of an elections expert and other witnesses are heard in open court and they maintain their credibility after cross examination and involving a significant number of votes, the Biden Campaign will have a problem. Perhaps this is why no lower court wants to allow actual evidence to be presented. Again, we have seen judges in PA rule on a case before expert testimony was heard. The US Supreme Court will have an opportunity to make our Consitution whole again. After all, that is what they are there for, right?
Supreme Court??? They'll have to get through the district courts as a first step, and the District Courts are throwing out these bogus claims of election fraud for lack of evidence. Looks like the probability of any of this crap making it to the Supreme Court is close to ZERO. You've either been listening to Trump, a pathological liar, or Fox News. Either way you're lost in a sea of warm fresh doo doo. Trump and his screwball lawyers can lie to you with impunity, but his lawyers can't lie to Judges without taking great risk (it's illegal). So what you're being told and what judges are hearing are as different as night and day. Don't let Trump turn you into one of his suckers.

Remember when Trump said Mexico would pay for a Wall? How did that work out?

Remember when Trump took a sharpie and rerouted a hurricane? How did that work out?

So having been lied to over and over, why would you put your faith in him now?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top