I trust my numbed and what the judges are told arers for reasons as stated in post one of this thread. However, if the testimony of an elections expert and other witnesses are heard in open court and they maintain their credibility after cross examination and involving a significant number of votes, the Biden Campaign will have a problem. Perhaps this is why no lower court wants to allow actual evidence to be presented. Again, we have seen judges in PA rule on a case before expert testimony was heard. The US Supreme Court will have an opportunity to make our Consitution whole again. After all, that is what they are there for, right?