Possible Election Fraud in Progress

piezoe said:
There is no indication in the data you posted that Biden received more votes than cast. The number of votes cast is not given, only the number of votes counted and the percent of total vote, i.e. Ballots received so far, that have been counted. This percent number can go up as more ballots are counted (read by the scanners) or down as more ballots arrive waiting to be counted. Ballots can arrive after Nov. 3rd and still be counted if they were mailed by Nov. 3rd. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER OF ANY FRAUD IN THE DATA YOU POSTED.
More...

'Splain this from NYT btw.

upload_2020-11-15_18-49-51.png
 
DTB2 said:
'Splain this from NYT btw.

View attachment 244184
More...
Why do I bother with you guys? Did you happen to notice the number of significant figures in those two numbers. Or else you can't read a simple chart. Jesus! By the way did you see the word "estimated," and also, I might add, if they made the colored chart from the data in the other chart the two significant figure number is wrong. It should be 3.3 not 3.2
 
Last edited:
piezoe said:
By the way did you see the word "estimated," and also, I might add, if they made the colored chart from the data in the other chart the two significant figure number is wrong. It should be 3.3 not 3.2
More...

Yup, I saw estimated, totally irrelevant to the 3.2 reported and 3.3 reported above. Reported is an actual number, estimated is not.

Why is there a discrepancy? Try harder explain rather than argue.
 
Try proving fraud....no one has to explain why a graphic has estimated or rounded numbers and is not anything official....

If these magic numbers are true then go to court or STFU... I am sure Rudy is as crack legal mind and going to get to the bottom of it.
 
DTB2 said:
'Splain this from NYT btw.

View attachment 244184
More...

This is the explanation: The numbers are clearly rounded with 1 decimal.
Depending of the way it is rounded you can have different results.

2020-11-16 15_49_38.jpg


Notice: The website that posted the numbers is not an offical website, nor have the numbers been audited and declared as officially correct. Not a single Court will accept these numbers as official.
 
virtusa said:
This is the explanation: The numbers are clearly rounded with 1 decimal.
Depending of the way it is rounded you can have different results.

View attachment 244202

Notice: The website that posted the numbers is not an offical website, nor have the numbers been audited and declared as officially correct. Not a single Court will accept these numbers as official.
More...

The "completed" vote numbers appear to always truncate any fractional aspect. This is going over some posters head yet they pretend they can go to court and make a case without understanding this. Note the final stats all say 99% even when the count is basically done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top