Possible Election Fraud in Progress

[El OchoCinco]

You know, or should know I am a natural born US citizen, unlike many of the posters against transparency

Do we really need to get into the many flimsy allegations by the Democrats over multiple issues over the years to expose the hypocracy of the Democrats and media? At least I provide ample support for my reasoning.

I made a claim that you are not a U.S. citizen because that is a fact and unless you can prove otherwise then I will stick with my claim.

Also, Democrats made allegations with HRC conceding the eletion and Obama stepping down and transfering power to Trump while also sharing information to Trump's transition team. There were no democratic issues that got in the way with the results of the election or innauguration.

 

[El OchoCinco]

Who can certify that these numbers are correct. They are fake for me. I saw other numbers.

Also how the hell did you personally observe this numbers unless you were personally counting and reporting them.

hearsay

 

[BeautifulStranger]

Immediately I see some flaws in your logic above. Note that the completed number is a whole number. 97% to 98% does not mean they added 1% more votes. It could be as much as 1.99% more votes ( the completed number obviously is rounded down; note that most states still read 99% when they are basically done the count ). 98% to 98% could be as much as 0.99% more votes completed

Add the two Wisconsin updates in question and you get 1.4% of votes for Biden with a 1% change in total votes cast.

The updates for the data on realclearpolitics.com are directly ported from he centralized electronic tabulation center as discussed on the linked video interview of the expert on electronic voting. The same data updates also goes to the media networks.

Are you seriously thinking a 150,000 vote fraud occurred in Michigan ? That would be incredibly easy to prove if it existed.

The electronic voting system has logs of various types that can show inappropriate or unathorized system access as well as showing other activity. Although the logs themselves are apparently not secure, the act of erasing them is likely to cause a mismatch of data in other areas of the system. Reconcilliation of voter databases and extended exit polls are another way to show official election result are not jiving with reality.

Further, besides the ratio of top votes to down votes descrepencies, the turnout in WI is nearly statistically impossible.

Bottom line, there is a particularly large amount of material to work with in Wisconsin, and I would expect investigators with minimal competence to uncover what really went on in, with a seemingly likely conclusion of fraud affecting the election outcome in Wisconsin.

Secondly, you don't know the source of those numbers. For all you know, some clerk is reading the computer system and manually sending the numbers to the source you are using. Where did these numbers come from ? Certainly a TV station or internet site is not a source of integrity it's just there to give viewers an idea of where things are going.

You repeated statement has been answered above.

There is more basis to believe election fraud has been committed than to believe otherwise at this point, given the multitude of irregularities we have seen.

Again, how this ultimately manifests itself is anybody’s guess.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Add the two Wisconsin updates in question and you get 1.4% of votes for Biden with a 1% change in total votes cast.

The updates for the data on realclearpolitics.com are directly ported from he centralized electronic tabulation center as discussed on the linked video interview of the expert on electronic voting. The same data updates also goes to the media networks.





The electronic voting system has logs of various types that can show inappropriate or unathorized system access as well as showing other activity. Although the logs themselves are apparently not secure, the act of erasing them is likely to cause a mismatch of data in other areas of the system. Reconcilliation of voter databases and extended exit polls are another way to show official election result are not jiving with reality.

Further, besides the ratio of top votes to down votes descrepencies, the turnout in WI is nearly statistically impossible.

Bottom line, there is a particularly large amount of material to work with in Wisconsin, and I would expect investigators with minimal competence to uncover what really went on in, with a seemingly likely conclusion of fraud affecting the election outcome in Wisconsin.




You repeated statement has been answered above.

There is more basis to believe election fraud has been committed than to believe otherwise at this point, given the multitude of irregularities we have seen.

Again, how this ultimately manifests itself is anybody’s guess.

I trust Trump, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood and Rudy Giuliani.

 

[BeautifulStranger]

Also how the hell did you personally observe this numbers unless you were personally counting and reporting them.

hearsay

Do the math: How does Biden gain 1.4% while total votes cast go up by 1% in Wisconsin? The source of information is from the centralized processing center itself.

There are also videos showing election progress updates, from beginning to end. So much for the hearsay argument.

Try again.

 

[piezoe]

Again, one of the indications of fraud is several election progress updates in key swing states showing Biden, and only Biden, recieving more votes than cast as indicated by the incremental change of total votes cast. For specific details on this, I refer you the the first post of the thread. Further, there have been other indications of fraud as reported and posted by several sources.

The most practical strategy right now for the Trump Administration seems to be getting relief in the courts, rather than persuing criminal charges at this time. Time is of the essense and we need to determine who is the duly elected President of the United States really is.

There is no indication in the data you posted that Biden received more votes than cast. The number of votes cast is not given, only the number of votes counted and the percent of total vote, i.e. Ballots received so far, that have been counted. This percent number can go up as more ballots are counted (read by the scanners) or down as more ballots arrive waiting to be counted. Ballots can arrive after Nov. 3rd and still be counted if they were mailed by Nov. 3rd. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER OF ANY FRAUD IN THE DATA YOU POSTED.

If you can't understand this, it is not our fault.

 

[piezoe]

I trust Trump, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood and Rudy Giuliani.

You are so fucking strange!

 

[Nine_Ender]

Add the two Wisconsin updates in question and you get 1.4% of votes for Biden with a 1% change in total votes cast.

I just explained to you why the 1% likely doesn't represent what you think it does. 1% can be anywhere from 1-1.99% change in total votes cast.

 

[Nine_Ender]

Further, besides the ratio of top votes to down votes descrepencies, the turnout in WI is nearly statistically impossible.

Based on what ? What is the population of Wisconsin, and how many people voted ? Let's see some numbers not empty claims. Statistically impossible is a pretty wild claim. Show me your calculation to come to this conclusion. I hope it doesn't involve registered Republicans as a criteria because some of those will have voted against Trump.

 

[Nine_Ender]

Do the math: How does Biden gain 1.4% while total votes cast go up by 1% in Wisconsin? The source of information is from the centralized processing center itself.

There are also videos showing election progress updates, from beginning to end. So much for the hearsay argument.

Try again.

What if the vote went up 1.95% ? Is the 1.4% possible ? Surely you have done this calculation. And remember, all these numbers are likely subject to clerical error in the extreme short term; I'm sure they have some checks in place to cover those kind of mistakes as they move through the ballots. You don't seem to be getting any of this. Trump has ordered a recount of Wisconsin so they'll see any issues during that process.