Quote from Misthos:
Here is an excerpt from my initial post in this thread:
One state retiree, 49 years old, paid, over the course of his entire career, a total of $124,000 towards his retirement pension and health benefits. What will we pay him? $3.3 million in pension payments over his life and nearly $500,000 for health care benefits -- a total of $3.8m on a $120,000 investment. Is that fair?
A retired teacher paid $62,000 towards her pension and nothing, yes nothing, for full family medical, dental and vision coverage over her entire career. What will we pay her? $1.4 million in pension benefits and another $215,000 in health care benefit premiums over her lifetime. Is it âfairâ for all of us and our children to have to pay for this excess?
Our new governor in NJ stated this. Now, I don't know how Florida's Pension works. But in the above example, 124K becomes a payout (including healthcare) of $3.8 million. Check at what you contributed, and see what your payout will ultimately be. Does it make sense? If not, you may be in for a rude awakening.
Now who in the private sector gets those kind of results? My 401K sure as hell doesn't. But luckily, I invest my own as well and get better returns from loads of research.... most people don't have the time or knowledge to get that kind of research.
So... if Florida's pension #s don't add up in the end, should other people pay the shortfall? Because that's what is going on in many states and municipalities.
And you cannot compare the stress level and job (in)security between the private and public sectors. I always worked in performanced based jobs if I wasn't self employed. My salary relied on it. A typical government worker would have a heart attack on day one if they walked in my shoes.