POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq

[max401]

World : last updated, March 18, 2003 23:44

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,144,00.html

Saddam gives OK to chemical weapons

Saddam Hussein has given field commanders the authority to use chemical weapons on their own initiative, without any further directives from the Iraqi leadership, says the Pentagon. Intelligence reports indicate a high risk that Iraq would use chemical weapons against allied troops. "We continue to receive reports supporting the assertion that there is a high risk the Iraqi regime would use chemical weapons at some point during any conflict," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman .

 

[TM_Direct]

Quote from max401:

World : last updated, March 18, 2003 23:44

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,144,00.html

Saddam gives OK to chemical weapons

Saddam Hussein has given field commanders the authority to use chemical weapons on their own initiative, without any further directives from the Iraqi leadership, says the Pentagon. Intelligence reports indicate a high risk that Iraq would use chemical weapons against allied troops. "We continue to receive reports supporting the assertion that there is a high risk the Iraqi regime would use chemical weapons at some point during any conflict," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman . [/QUOTE

MAX: Are you a moron or what????? Saddam doesn't have them..he said so in his december declaration and MSFE printed numerous links from the internet that clearly showed SH does not have them....Boy you are sooooo naive.....Even the French said he did not have them...have you been paying attention to this thread for the last three months??????

 

[max401]

Quote from TM_Direct:

Quote from max401:

World : last updated, March 18, 2003 23:44

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,144,00.html

Saddam gives OK to chemical weapons

Saddam Hussein has given field commanders the authority to use chemical weapons on their own initiative, without any further directives from the Iraqi leadership, says the Pentagon. Intelligence reports indicate a high risk that Iraq would use chemical weapons against allied troops. "We continue to receive reports supporting the assertion that there is a high risk the Iraqi regime would use chemical weapons at some point during any conflict," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman . [/QUOTE

MAX: Are you a moron or what????? Saddam doesn't have them..he said so in his december declaration and MSFE printed numerous links from the internet that clearly showed SH does not have them....Boy you are sooooo naive.....Even the French said he did not have them...have you been paying attention to this thread for the last three months??????

Awwww man.... Alzheimers must be kicking in early.... :eek: :eek:

 

[ElCubano]

Quote from max401:

Awwww man.... Alzheimers must be kicking in early.... :eek: :eek:

Finaly an admission....
The first step is always the hardest, I am sure that the harder you work at it the less of a moron you will be....good luck

 

[max401]

Quote from ElCubano:



Finaly an admission....
The first step is always the hardest, I am sure that the harder you work at it the less of a moron you will be....good luck

Well then... it will just be that much easier for you to live in your fantasy world where you are kicking my ass in some parking lot in Little Havana.

 

[TM_Direct]

The CIA was in constant contact with military leaders to make sure that U.S. warplanes did not bomb CIA operatives already in Iraq, the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
They also revealed that intelligence reports were indicating that Saddam was preparing to use chemical weapons against U.S. troops.
Intercepts of Iraqi military radio communications suggest that artillery shells with chemical warheads were being handed out to troops of Saddam’s elite Republican Guard at Al Kut, southeast of Baghdad, the sources said.

Other evidence indicated that preparations were under way to coat bridges and roadways with a lethal VX nerve agent to slow U.S. troops on their advance to Baghdad.
U.S. intelligence reports also indicated that Saddam had as many as 50 unmanned drones he could use to attack U.S. troops with chemical weapons from

==============================================

THERE ARE NO WMD'S IN IRAQ....FRANCE AND MSFE SAID SO...WHERE IS WILD AND HIS MASFE ALTER EGO THESE DAYS???

 

[max401]

Quote from TM_Direct:


==============================================

THERE ARE NO WMD'S IN IRAQ....FRANCE AND MSFE SAID SO...WHERE IS WILD AND HIS MASFE ALTER EGO THESE DAYS???

In the bunker?

 

[msfe]

in Lugano www.lugano.ch - waiting for the liberation and democratization of Switzerland by the "coalition of the willing"

 

[TM_Direct]

Quote from msfe:

in Lugano www.lugano.ch - waiting for the liberation and democratization of Switzerland by the "coalition of the willing"

Why would we liberate pathetic and cowardly people like the swiss? I could take them over myself with a bat and some check books....half the people would surrender to me ..the other half would kill each other just to get my account in one of their corrupt swiss accounts.

 

[max401]

Quote from msfe:

in Lugano www.lugano.ch - waiting for the liberation and democratization of Switzerland by the "coalition of the willing"

Switzerland? You must have meant Sudetenland. In any event, the Iraq invasion is not like your pal's "entrance" into that area, even bloodless as it was.