POLL: The repercussions of a US attack on Iraq
- Thread starter candletrader
- Start date
max401:`Switzerland? You must have meant Sudetenland. In any event, the Iraq invasion is not like your pal's "entrance" into that area, even bloodless as it was.´
it was Henry Ford´s pal Adolf H. who entered the Sudetenland
Henry Ford and the Nazis
http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/chapter_06.htm
he had an international agreement in his pocket, signed by the big powers of the time
Agreement concluded at Munich, September 29, 1938, between Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/munich1.htm
the Iraq invasion is indeed not like Ford´s pal's "entrance" into that area, even bloodless as it was - apart from occurring in a different continent it isn´t based on anything even remotely related to international law and certainly not bloodless.
Switzerland was neutral then [like the USA] and is neutral now
it was Henry Ford´s pal Adolf H. who entered the Sudetenland
Henry Ford and the Nazis
http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/chapter_06.htm
he had an international agreement in his pocket, signed by the big powers of the time
Agreement concluded at Munich, September 29, 1938, between Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/munich1.htm
the Iraq invasion is indeed not like Ford´s pal's "entrance" into that area, even bloodless as it was - apart from occurring in a different continent it isn´t based on anything even remotely related to international law and certainly not bloodless.
Switzerland was neutral then [like the USA] and is neutral now
I suggest all the anti-war types either leave this web site or else dump their aliases and start over as decent people. Otherwise they are in for a daily humiliation. Get Ready !
max401:`That's what happens when you appease a madman.
See your pal Saddam for details.´
See your pal Rumsfeld for even more detailed details
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/021100-iraq01.htm
See your pal Saddam for details.´
See your pal Rumsfeld for even more detailed details
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/021100-iraq01.htm
What a laugh! Here is one of the "interviewer's" questions:
"Why does the U.S. government want to attack Iraq again?"
Followed by: "Whoever controls the oil of the world, controls the world, basically. Is that true? "
All this does is give the opinion that it's all about the oil that allegedly we want to control for ourselves. Amazing. The "interviewer" left out this salient question:
"But, Jeremy, if the US is hell bent on controlling the world's oil supply, as you claim, why did they simply pack up and leave Iraq and Kuwait in 1991?"
Tell ya what msfe, why don't you aswer for good ol' objective Jeremy? Why did we walk away from what must have been 30-40% of the proven reserves of crude?
Eat your heart out Msfe,
I have it on good authority that people employed by S.H.'s regime to infiltrate groups (which would obviously include websites) with the purpose of inciting them to side with S.H. by lodging false and incorrect information (clearly including projects like cutting, pasting and posting misleading articles published earlier by their fellow agent provocateurs elsewhere), WILL be liable to punishment and sought out and severly dealt with once the higher priority items have been taken care of.
I was also told that quite a lot of effort has already been put into gathering this type of information.
I wonder where that would put Msfe ?
If it was up to me a nice tar and feather job before he is thrown in jail and the key thrown away would be most deserving.
I doubt that hiding in the holes of your swiss cheese will help you Msfe. You will have nowhere to run.
freealways
I have it on good authority that people employed by S.H.'s regime to infiltrate groups (which would obviously include websites) with the purpose of inciting them to side with S.H. by lodging false and incorrect information (clearly including projects like cutting, pasting and posting misleading articles published earlier by their fellow agent provocateurs elsewhere), WILL be liable to punishment and sought out and severly dealt with once the higher priority items have been taken care of.
I was also told that quite a lot of effort has already been put into gathering this type of information.
I wonder where that would put Msfe ?
If it was up to me a nice tar and feather job before he is thrown in jail and the key thrown away would be most deserving.
I doubt that hiding in the holes of your swiss cheese will help you Msfe. You will have nowhere to run.
freealways
http://slate.msn.com/id/2080341/
Where's Saddam? Some U.S. officials have said that capturing Saddam isn't important as long as he's cut off from the controls of power, but this is clearly nonsenseâpre-emptive CYA in case he slips through the noose like Osama Bin Laden. Others say privately that it's supremely important to kill the big guy, preferably Mussolini-style, hanging from his heels with lots of locals celebrating around the corpse. The big hope is and always has been that, once the bombs start falling, some of Saddam's henchmenâknowing that they're doomed if they stay with the bossâwill kill him, then surrender and plead for mercy. This might happen. It might not; the loyalists might stay loyal.
Where's Saddam? Some U.S. officials have said that capturing Saddam isn't important as long as he's cut off from the controls of power, but this is clearly nonsenseâpre-emptive CYA in case he slips through the noose like Osama Bin Laden. Others say privately that it's supremely important to kill the big guy, preferably Mussolini-style, hanging from his heels with lots of locals celebrating around the corpse. The big hope is and always has been that, once the bombs start falling, some of Saddam's henchmenâknowing that they're doomed if they stay with the bossâwill kill him, then surrender and plead for mercy. This might happen. It might not; the loyalists might stay loyal.
Rumsfeld and msfe on a camping trip....
At around 3 AM Rumsfeld wakes msfe and urgently asks: "Msfe, quick, look up... What do you deduce!?
Msfe replies, "Well, I see the night sky and thousands of stars, each one representing an Iraqi oil well your country wants to take over."
Msfe, you idiot! Someone has stolen our tent!
At around 3 AM Rumsfeld wakes msfe and urgently asks: "Msfe, quick, look up... What do you deduce!?
Msfe replies, "Well, I see the night sky and thousands of stars, each one representing an Iraqi oil well your country wants to take over."
Msfe, you idiot! Someone has stolen our tent!