Poll majority: Gays' orientation can't change

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Blood transfusions and medical procedures that are not sterile...from needles...and sharing a needle by drug users...

Doh!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1807018.stm

I am guessing a homophobe like you thinks all the aids in Africa is a result of homosexual behavior too...
More...

I thought it was determined that AIDS was the byproduct of bestiality. Individuals practicing their freedom of have any type of "affairs" they find enjoyable.

Adult men and (hopefully) adult chimps swapping bodily fluids...
- oh crap!! :eek: :eek: , maybe even chimpanzee anal fluids at that!
Geepers, this crap is discussing and simply ain't right. Agree?
Now that there, is no right way to turn yo' wood to putty dude, but as you would have it it seems, all's fair in the pursuit of those Roman values!?

I read your position Z as: Fu@k off with your controlling ideals- if a person finds "it" feels good, let it be -cause it's in their bedroom?

Hail Caesar! :(

Till they donate their putrid blood in exchange for a few coin or warthog burgers.
 
Quote from jem:

I am not fan of ann coulter. Although she is sometimes correct.

This deal of sending his wife out to do his talking only proves further that Coulter is right. He is a fag with 400 dollar haircuts.

He has made two large mistakes in his career. Getting abused by Cheney in their debate and now handling his fag stuff like a fag.

The correct response was to say well if I'm a fag shes a transvestite. It would still be a good response. But he is too much of fag to use it.

yeah this has anything to do with my like or dislike of homosexuals.

You are getting desperate I have proven, out of your own mouth, your are intolerant and filled with hate. You attacked my Religion (which you do not even name pick correctly) and you now tell me I must be in a loveless marriage.

You are acting like a sick wounded animal.

Oh no zzz said I am Gay - oh no!!!!! This liberal defender of gays is using sexual orientation as some sort insult or put down. Could he be any more twisted and sick?

zzz I don't know or care if your are gay but I do know you had to be the biggest fag on in your neighborhood growing up and now you are the biggest fag on Et.
More...
 
on the aclu thread zzzz spewed the following bile:

1. Yall klanish crack me up...angry white males, angry fearful Christians who have a history of burning witches, inquisitions, killing American Indians, etc.

....all in the name of God, of course.


and this :


2. Only Right Wing Fundamentalist Christians walk around with pork on their feet...snorting, belching like the pigs they are...

---

Nice substantive response zzz. so I will post the real issue again. Why don't you compare a loving two parent home with a loving one parent home.

Or an average two parent home with and average one.


Your comparisons were manipulative by design. As is most of your leftist crap. And again, I respect many single parents, I just point out that your view of a reengineered America is based on a croc of improperly considered experiments.
 
Quote from jem:

I am not fan of ann coulter. Although she is sometimes correct.

This deal of sending his wife out to do his talking only proves further that Coulter is right. He is a fag with 400 dollar haircuts.

He has made two large mistakes in his career. Getting abused by Cheney in their debate and now handling his fag stuff like a fag.

The correct response was to say well if I'm a fag shes a transvestite. It would still be a good response. But he is too much of fag to use it.

yeah this has anything to do with my like or dislike of homosexuals.

You are getting desperate I have proven, out of your own mouth, your are intolerant and filled with hate. You attacked my Religion (which you do not even name pick correctly) and you now tell me I must be in a loveless marriage.

You are acting like a sick wounded animal.

Oh no zzz said I am Gay - oh no!!!!! This liberal defender of gays is using sexual orientation as some sort insult or put down. Could he be any more twisted and sick?

zzz I don't know or care if your are gay but I do know you had to be the biggest fag on in your neighborhood growing up and now you are the biggest fag on Et.
More...
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Who would take the time to read all of your drivel...

Legally, show me a child who has been fathered without male sperm...

So, legally, the child does have a father.

The child may not have a legal male guardian
More...


your brand of "intellectualism" is little more than a constant affront ... at the end of the day, you've accomplished little more than embarrass yourself and soil your audience...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/affront


Regards,

One of the Klannish



http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_2_artificial_insemination.html

.....

As intentionality has come to supplant biology, the law, by pretending nature doesn’t exist, has not caught up with reality; it has pole-vaulted over it. A family court in Burlington County, New Jersey, recently put two women on a state birth certificate. Last year, Virginia issued a birth certificate for a gay couple that read “Parent A” and “Parent B.” Massachusetts officials proposed crossing out “Father” on the state’s birth certificate and replacing it with “Second Parent” (until then-governor Mitt Romney nixed the plan). Many legal scholars are now proposing that courts move beyond the “heterosexist model” entirely. Why not put three parents—or four, for that matter—on the birth certificate? This past January, an Ontario court did just that. Intentionality, it seems, can accomplish almost anything.
 
Quote from drmarkan:

If homosexuals are born with the predisposition to homosexuality, then would we consider it to be a birth defect? I use the term birth defect to describe something that is not natural, not as a put down. Considering that the natural order in any species is to procreate to continue it's survival, homosexuality would go against what is considered to be the norm.

I know I'll probably get a bunch of people screaming at me that I'm a homophobe or bigoted, but I think it is an honest question.
More...

Birth is not natural, so it is a "defect".

Birth is the continuation of a false idea: that the Son of God can change himself.

The concept of male and female is not natural.

The behavior of male and female is not different than any other behavior. None of it is natural. But it is preferred.

Preferences are a selection process that is not natural.

Selection is a form of judgment, which is not natural to the minds way of thinking.

The "last judgement" is a process of weaning the Son of God off of all preferential treatment of his brothers.

Since preferential judgments keep the world turning, the world will end when there are no more judgements being made.

The world will end because it is not natural.

Meanwhile, not one form of behavior is more natural than another.

Behavior is not natural.

Since behavior was invented, some behavior is useful in making behavior obsolete.

Male-female behavior is the most popular preference within an unatural way of thinking.

It is used for perpetuating behavior.

Behavior imprisons you because you need do nothing.

Doing anything reinforces the idea that you are a body.

So everything is a temptation.

You are not a body, because the Son of God is not a body. He has no limits.

Bodies are a limit. They limit love. Therefore they cannot "make" love.

Love is union. Bodies separate, and can never join.

Mind is joined, but bodies are devised to "prove" that the mind can be separate.

To love is to allow what God joined - the mind - to be as it is: One.

By letting what is true be true, the Son of God will "change" back to his natural state.

What is true?

All minds are joined as one.

Let this be true, and you will know Heaven. And you will know love.

Preferences will end, and with them, the world. So you see, anybody can change, but the Son of God is changless.





Jesus
 
Someone Respond Directly to the Following Paragraph: (ANYTHING WILL BE ACCEPTED!)



http://www.city-journal.org/html/17...semination.html

.....

As intentionality has come to supplant biology, the law, by pretending nature doesn’t exist, has not caught up with reality; it has pole-vaulted over it. A family court in Burlington County, New Jersey, recently put two women on a state birth certificatex Last year, Virginia issued a birth certificate for a gay couple that read “Parent A” and “Parent B.” Massachusetts officials proposed crossing out “Father” on the state’s birth certificate and replacing it with “Second Parent” (until then-governor Mitt Romney nixed the plan). Many legal scholars are now proposing that courts move beyond the “heterosexist model” entirely. Why not put three parents—or four, for that matter—on the birth certificate? This past January, an Ontario court did just that. Intentionality, it seems, can accomplish almost anything.
 
I think it can be a pretty fricken selfish thing to to do. The child may someday wish to know who the biological father is - perhaps for health reasons
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top