You do not seem to know the difference between singular and plural. He said both "caps" note the s on the end. Now let's see the ice gain in the Arctic. Yes we know, Antarctica may be gain ing ice. But it's still warming there. It's a temporary condition due to global warming. Huge ice shelves are breaking off, undercut by warmer waters. This idiot fhl is making it sound like both poles are gaining ice. That's an intentional lie. Or he's just stupid. You know stupid.
Poles
- Thread starter Buy1Sell2
- Start date
You do not seem to know the difference between singular and plural. He said both "caps" note the s on the end. Now let's see the ice gain in the Arctic. Yes we know, Antarctica may be gain ing ice. But it's still warming there. It's a temporary condition due to global warming. Huge ice shelves are breaking off, undercut by warmer waters. This idiot fhl is making it sound like both poles are gaining ice. That's an intentional lie. Or he's just stupid. You know stupid.
Read this and then come back and tell that both sides are equally convincing. Because, among the experts there is NO doubt. None.
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
^BTW, this is the kind of information the FF interests don't want you to see, so they want to stop NASA from being so bold as to disseminate truth.
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
^BTW, this is the kind of information the FF interests don't want you to see, so they want to stop NASA from being so bold as to disseminate truth.
ok, I read it, is that all you want me to do? Great! Global warming isn't as hard as I thought it was going to be. I am now totally convinced global warming is real and man made co2 is causing it. Whew do I feel better now. ok then, problem identified. (I was afraid I was going to have to do something. No wonder all the movie stars are still flying around burning up fossil fuel. They read the post!)
So vote for politicians that that will do something about it. Because it's a big problem for all life on earth. As those science organizations say.
Round and round we go, what will the politicians that will do something about it do? So far, the only politician that wants to do something about it owns ocean front property. We have 83 years to go before it gets bad. How about no more fossil fuel for developed countries after 2020? By then it will be so bad that even the republicans will cut back. I think they already have the technology to create algae fuel, but it is pretty costly right now, comes to about $10/gallon to run a passenger car. BP is the number 1 investor last I checked. But I get the feeling that nothing which allows any oil company to survive will be good enough for the global warming crowd. Not sure what capitalism has to do with global warming, but they seem to have made some connection.
The politicians can set an escalating carbon tax. And no, Gore's house is not on the ocean. No we don't have 83 years.
That's it? if it's all about a tax that explains why the democrats are for it and the republicans are against it. Too easy, I thought it had something to do with science.
The intentional lie is the numerous times you have stated that Antarctica was on a net bases losing ice. THAT IS THE LIE!!
His team also typically forgets to mention the volcanoes under the ice may be responsible for a great deal of the ice melt.
http://www.livescience.com/46194-volcanoes-melt-antarctic-glaciers.html
and they may be doing the same thing under the arctic. this article may be a bit more speculative considering the source.
http://climatechangedispatch.com/heat-from-deep-ocean-fault-punches-hole-in-arctic-ice-sheet.html/
http://www.livescience.com/46194-volcanoes-melt-antarctic-glaciers.html
and they may be doing the same thing under the arctic. this article may be a bit more speculative considering the source.
http://climatechangedispatch.com/heat-from-deep-ocean-fault-punches-hole-in-arctic-ice-sheet.html/