Polar Vortex Causes Hundreds Of Injuries

In 1974, Time Magazine blamed the cold polar vortex on global cooling.

‘Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds —the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world.’

Forty years later, Time Magazine blames the cold polar vortex on global warming

‘But not only does the cold spell not disprove climate change, it may well be that global warming could be making the occasional bout of extreme cold weather in the U.S. even more likely. Right now much of the U.S. is in the grip of a polar vortex, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a whirlwind of extremely cold, extremely dense air that forms near the poles.’
 
Quote from OccupyThis:

In 1974, Time Magazine blamed the cold polar vortex on global cooling.

‘Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds —the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world.’

Forty years later, Time Magazine blames the cold polar vortex on global warming

‘But not only does the cold spell not disprove climate change, it may well be that global warming could be making the occasional bout of extreme cold weather in the U.S. even more likely. Right now much of the U.S. is in the grip of a polar vortex, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a whirlwind of extremely cold, extremely dense air that forms near the poles.’

We went through this already. Allow me to save you the time of waiting for our resident global warming shriek to respond:

Quote from futurecurrents:

Who the hell cares what Time magazine did? They are not a science journal and that was 40 years ago. Magazines print all kinds of crap.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Your judge of just about anything, but especially what a good Christian and what good science is, is way off the mark. Like upside down. Insanely so. Twisted, cynically and delusionally so.

Al Gore is on balance, a great man and has done great things for mankind. Just like Bono and Jimmy Carter, who you also perversely criticize.

The criticism of him is largely without merit and amounts to character assasination. One that has occurred because he's a threat to the profits of powers that be ........the fossil fuel industry.

FC: Al Gore a great man and no doubt GW Bush a 'denier'

Al Gore has multiple houses but his main house in Nashville in 2006/2007 had energy bills of about $2400/mo--20X national average.
GW Bush: one house built of recycled materials, has a water recovery system and a energy bill of 1/4 of national average.

By the way, a similar comparison can be made on charitable contributions, but that is another story.

"But...but...but....but....Al Gore cares more!!!"
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:


singed toe. If you continue to quote the very dumb, hateful, homophobic moron that is fucrum, I will gladly put you on ignore also. You're only slightly more worthy of consideration than lucrum. Which is to say, very little.

Now if, in the unlikely event he says something that shows true value, go ahead, please quote him, but if you continue to repost this kind of crap I will put you on ignore.

BTW, not that it matters, but for your information, I am not gay. In case you were confused.
 
Quote from mark2012:

Gore has been involved with the environment for a number of decades. In 1976, after joining the United States House of Representatives, Gore held the "first congressional hearings on the climate change, and co-sponsor[ed] hearings on toxic waste and global warming."[2][3] He continued to speak on the topic throughout the 1980s[4] and was known as one of the Atari Democrats, later called the "Democrats' Greens, politicians who see issues like clean air, clean water and global warming as the key to future victories for their party."[1][5]
In 1989, while still a Senator, Gore published an editorial in the Washington Post, in which he argued
Humankind has suddenly entered into a brand new relationship with the planet Earth. The world's forests are being destroyed; an enormous hole is opening in the ozone layer. Living species are dying at an unprecedented rate.[6]
In 1990, Senator Gore presided over a three-day conference with legislators from over 42 countries which sought to create a Global Marshall Plan, "under which industrial nations would help less developed countries grow economically while still protecting the environment." [7]
The Concord Monitor says that Gore "was one of the first politicians to grasp the seriousness of climate change and to call for a reduction in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouses gases


NASA on Carbon dioxide gasses.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/


Yes Gore has been involved with these very important issues for a long time. He is not doing it for money. Something the hypocritical "Christian Right" can't fathom.
 
Quote from OccupyThis:

In 1974, Time Magazine blamed the cold polar vortex on global cooling.

‘Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds —the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world.’

Forty years later, Time Magazine blames the cold polar vortex on global warming

‘But not only does the cold spell not disprove climate change, it may well be that global warming could be making the occasional bout of extreme cold weather in the U.S. even more likely. Right now much of the U.S. is in the grip of a polar vortex, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a whirlwind of extremely cold, extremely dense air that forms near the poles.’



So what? It amazes me what you moron deniers consider a good argument.

In the thirty years leading up to the 1970s, available temperature recordings suggested that there was a cooling trend. As a result some scientists suggested that the current inter-glacial period could rapidly draw to a close, which might result in the Earth plunging into a new ice age over the next few centuries. This idea could have been reinforced by the knowledge that the smog that climatologists call ‘aerosols’ – emitted by human activities into the atmosphere – also caused cooling. In fact, as temperature recording has improved in coverage, it’s become apparent that the cooling trend was most pronounced in northern land areas and that global temperature trends were in fact relatively steady during the period prior to 1970.

At the same time as some scientists were suggesting we might be facing another ice age, a greater number published contradicting studies. Their papers showed that the growing amount of greenhouse gasses that humans were putting into the atmosphere would cause much greater warming – warming that would a much greater influence on global temperature than any possible natural or human-caused cooling effects.

By 1980 the predictions about ice ages had ceased, due to the overwhelming evidence contained in an increasing number of reports that warned of global warming. Unfortunately, the small number of predictions of an ice age appeared to be much more interesting than those of global warming, so it was those sensational 'Ice Age' stories in the press that so many people tend to remember.


1970s_papers.gif


Figure 1: Number of papers classified as predicting global cooling (blue) or warming (red). In no year were there more cooling papers than warming papers (Peterson 2008).
 
Quote from Arnie:

The Coast Guard said it was the earliest the ice had frozen here since the 1930s, and the river connecting Lakes Superior and Huron has been some of the toughest ice they have seen. With cutting through ice, the noise is loud and constant.

http://www.wwgp1050.com/2014/01/07/us-coast-guard-battles-ice-to-keep-shipping-channels-open/



IceTrend1.png



Note the "huge 50% recovery" that the right wing denial machine has harped upon that occurred over the last year. Doesn't look so impressive now does it? Of course if the bullshit denier articles in Forbes and similar places included this chart, the deception would not work so well.
 
Quote from Shorty53:

FC: Al Gore a great man and no doubt GW Bush a 'denier'

Al Gore has multiple houses but his main house in Nashville in 2006/2007 had energy bills of about $2400/mo--20X national average.
GW Bush: one house built of recycled materials, has a water recovery system and a energy bill of 1/4 of national average.

By the way, a similar comparison can be made on charitable contributions, but that is another story.

"But...but...but....but....Al Gore cares more!!!"



http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/gorehome.asp
 
Back
Top